On Thu, Mar 10, Tom Rini wrote:
> I've just been using sort by arrival as an imperfect, but still mostly
Just procmail the stuff, if bk cant do it.
:0 f
* ^X-my-mailinglist-tag: bk-commits-head.vger.kernel.org
| formail -i "Date: `env TZ=UTC date -R`"
This doesnt he
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:11:45AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
> > bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
> > an explicit Date header on t
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Now, if James trigger scripts set the date of the email by the date of the
> > commit, that sounds like a misfeature, but you'd better talk to James, not
> > me, since he's the one doing that part..
>
> Hah ok. Which James ?
I was thin
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
> bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
> an explicit Date header on the outgoing emails.
>
> It then becomes a matter of deciding whether thi
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tre
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> > commit messages for the csets
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
>
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day yo
Two's company ...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> While we are at such requests ...
>
> When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
> are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
> in the netdev tree.
>
> For example,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day you
> pulled, and not the day wh
While we are at such requests ...
When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
in the netdev tree.
For example, if Jeff commited a patch from somebody in his netdev tree 3
weeks ago, and you pull Jef
11 matches
Mail list logo
