Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 14:50 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 22/08/18 14:38, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> Could you give that patchlet[1] a go? It solves a similar issue for me > >> on a different platform. > >> > >> [1] https://lists.cs.colum

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-22 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 22/08/18 14:38, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Could you give that patchlet[1] a go? It solves a similar issue for me >> on a different platform. >> >> [1] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2018-August/032469.html > > Yup, all bett

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Could you give that patchlet[1] a go? It solves a similar issue for me > on a different platform. > > [1] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2018-August/032469.html Yup, all better. -Mike

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-21 Thread Marc Zyngier
Hi Mike, On 31/07/18 19:28, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:24 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 13:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> FYI, per kvm unit tests, 4.16-rt definitely has more kvm issues. > > But it's not RT, or rather most of it isn't... > >>> h

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-01 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 08:22 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:02:25 +0100, > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 06:35 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > > > Is it something that is reproducible with the current mainline (non-RT)? > > > > These waters

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-01 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 08:22 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > Box is a 4 node/64 core TaiShan 2280. > > Is that what is also known as D05/HIP07, with 64 Cortex-A72? No idea, our rent-a-box web client shows nothing informative. -Mike

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-08-01 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:02:25 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > [1 ] > On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 06:35 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > Is it something that is reproducible with the current mainline (non-RT)? > > These waters are a bit muddy, it's config dependent. I'm trying to > generate a repr

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-07-31 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 06:35 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Is it something that is reproducible with the current mainline (non-RT)? These waters are a bit muddy, it's config dependent. I'm trying to generate a reproducing !RT config for -rc7 as we speak. If I build openSUSE/master-default, it d

Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-07-31 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:28:49 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: Hi Mike, > > [1 ] > On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:24 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 13:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > FYI, per kvm unit tests, 4.16-rt definitely has more kvm issues. > > But it's not RT, or ra

bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

2018-07-31 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:24 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 13:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > FYI, per kvm unit tests, 4.16-rt definitely has more kvm issues. But it's not RT, or rather most of it isn't... > > huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests # uname -r > > 4.16.18-rt