;> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9247699/
>>>
>>> ath9k: Fix beacon configuration assertion failure
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9281191/
>>>
>>> Felix (CCed) & Benjamin: please take a look and advice which one I
>>> shoul
Benjamin Berg writes:
> On Fr, 2016-08-19 at 13:03 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Actually, I see two patches which might be related but not identical:
>>
>> ath9k: fix client mode beacon configuration
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9247699/
>>
>> at
On Fr, 2016-08-19 at 13:03 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Actually, I see two patches which might be related but not identical:
>
> ath9k: fix client mode beacon configuration
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9247699/
>
> ath9k: Fix beacon configuration asserti
0x1e5/0x470
>>> [ 16.910880] [] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
>>> [ 16.910885] [] ? process_one_work+0x470/0x470
>>> [ 16.910888] [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
>>> [ 16.910894] [] ? __switch_to+0x2c3/0x610
>>> [ 16.910899] [] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
&g
thread+0x48/0x4e0
>> [ 16.910885] [] ? process_one_work+0x470/0x470
>> [ 16.910888] [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
>> [ 16.910894] [] ? __switch_to+0x2c3/0x610
>> [ 16.910899] [] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
>> [ 16.910902] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
>>
Adi Ratiu wrote:
> commit cfda2d8e2314 ("ath9k: Fix beacon configuration for
> addition/removal of interfaces") reworked beacon configs to happen at
> IF changes and missed cases when NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION has no beacons
> with the corresponding values iter_data.primary_beacon_vif == 0 and
> iter
commit cfda2d8e2314 ("ath9k: Fix beacon configuration for
addition/removal of interfaces") reworked beacon configs to happen at
IF changes and missed cases when NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION has no beacons
with the corresponding values iter_data.primary_beacon_vif == 0 and
iter_data.nbcnvifs == 0 in ath9k
7 matches
Mail list logo
