On 8/3/05, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the
> > activity LED?
>
> No, but I have observed that SActive never gets cleared by the device
> for non-NCQ commands (which is probably w
Martin Wilck wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else) a
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 07:17 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >>If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
> >>wrong in setting the SActive bit.
> >
> > I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
> > original posts about thi
Martin Wilck wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else)
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:17:13AM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >>If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
> >>wrong in setting the SActive bit.
> >
> >I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
> >original posts about
On Wed, Aug 03 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >>If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
> >>wrong in setting the SActive bit.
> >
> >I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
> >original posts about this in the NCQ thre
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong beh
On Tue, Aug 02 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Hello Jeff, hello Jens, hello everybody,
>
> I am referring to the debate about whether or not setting the SActive
> bit for non-NCQ ATA commands (e.g. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/26/142).
>
> In our machines, this behavior of the Linux AHCI driver caus
Hello Jeff, hello Jens, hello everybody,
I am referring to the debate about whether or not setting the SActive
bit for non-NCQ ATA commands (e.g. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/26/142).
In our machines, this behavior of the Linux AHCI driver causes the HD
activity LED to stay on all the time. If
9 matches
Mail list logo
