Re: Yet another report on the dquot oops

J Sloan wrote: > David Ford wrote: > > > Did you apply the quota patch that was posted this week? > > Yes, thanx for the sanity check - > > After the oops, I remembered something about a patch, > and there was indeed one posted by Herr Diehl. > > Will check that out - now I'm curious if there's s

Re: Yet another report on the dquot oops

David Ford wrote: > Did you apply the quota patch that was posted this week? Yes, thanx for the sanity check - After the oops, I remembered something about a patch, and there was indeed one posted by Herr Diehl. Will check that out - now I'm curious if there's some reason Linus didn't like the

Re: Yet another report on the dquot oops

Did you apply the quota patch that was posted this week? -d -- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'." begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:http://www.kalifornia.com/images/

Yet another report on the dquot oops

Hi all, Just adding my useless complaints the the list - Currently running test8-pre1 + rik vm patches, very solid. Tonight I tried test9-pre1 - The most common occurrence is that vi segfaults on exit. Here is a decoded oops immediately after booting test9-pre1: jjs ---