Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Yes there is a blatant violation

On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 10:15 +, ni...@redchan.it wrote: > > Again, Yes I am an attorney, yes Bruce Perens is correct, Yes I know > what I'm talking about in this field more than you American Programmers, > no you do not know what you are talking about if you have not studied > law. If your

Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Yes there is a blatant violation

Or as Bruce Perens put it (and yes Bruce Perens is correct, and yes I am an attorney) Bruce Perens wrote: "Currently, Grsecurity is a commercial product and is distributed only to paying customers. Under their Stable Patch Access Agreement, customers are warned that if they r

Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Yes there is a blatant violation

On 2017-07-29 20:07, Theodore Ts'o wrote: It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely... Yes it is. Here's a posting from before that explains it: GPL v2 Section 6 states simply "You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of