Thank you Mr. Rankin for saying this. Bruce Perens blocked me* (also
calling me a "fool" later to a 3rd party) after I started to brainstorm
the defenses that would be raised about a week or two ago: letting
everyone in the world know what he thought of me for mentioning laches
etc.
Such talk
On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 10:15 +, ni...@redchan.it wrote:
>
> Again, Yes I am an attorney, yes Bruce Perens is correct, Yes I know
> what I'm talking about in this field more than you American Programmers,
> no you do not know what you are talking about if you have not studied
> law.
If your
Thank you. When earlier I brought up latches when I started
brainstorming the defenses GRSecurity might raise, Bruce Perens quickly
dismissed me as a "fool".
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html
OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will
block
First of all, give some proof of your accusation.
Second of all, prove the relevance of such.
Third of all: identity politics is off-topic in a discussion on
copyright.
Is it not you, thus, who is trolling and attempting to derail the
conversation?
On 2017-07-29 16:49, Adam Borowski wrote
Or as Bruce Perens put it (and yes Bruce Perens is correct, and yes I am
an attorney)
Bruce Perens wrote:
"Currently, Grsecurity is a commercial product and is distributed only
to paying customers. Under their Stable Patch Access Agreement,
customers are warned that if they r
On 2017-07-29 20:07, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely...
Yes it is.
Here's a posting from before that explains it:
GPL v2
Section 6 states simply
"You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise
of
On Sat 2017-07-29 22:55:22, David Lang wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2017, Paul G. Allen wrote:
>
> >>It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely
> >>requires that people who have been distributed copies of GPL'ed code
> >>must not be restricted from further redistribution of the cod
Hi!
On Sat 2017-07-29 17:20:52, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> > It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely
> > requires that people who have been distributed copies of GPL'ed code
> > must not be restricted from further redistribution of the code. It
> > does not require that that s
On 07/30/2017 12:55 AM, David Lang wrote:
> You are thinking of Trademarks, they must be defended or you loose them.
> Contracts and Licenses do not need to be defended at every chance or risk
> loosing them.
No, not always, it can apply in plain contract as well. The defenses that
could be later
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017, Paul G. Allen wrote:
It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely
requires that people who have been distributed copies of GPL'ed code
must not be restricted from further redistribution of the code. It
does not require that that someone who is distributin
> It's not even clear that there is infringement. The GPL merely
> requires that people who have been distributed copies of GPL'ed code
> must not be restricted from further redistribution of the code. It
> does not require that that someone who is distributing it must
> available on a public FTP
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 09:32:36AM -0600, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> I have not contributed to the kernel for some time (I have been
> working on some stuff, but nothing that's been contributed), so I
> don't know if any of my code would be infringed (or if it's even in
> the latest kernels).
>
> My w
Note that this is quite clearly yet another of MikeeUSA's sockpuppets. And
you guys really don't want to be caught in another of his troll threads.
Yeah, GRsecurity is a problem, but don't let our dear Mikee milk it.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ What Would Jesus Do, MUD/MMORPG edition:
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ • multiplay with
I have not contributed to the kernel for some time (I have been
working on some stuff, but nothing that's been contributed), so I
don't know if any of my code would be infringed (or if it's even in
the latest kernels).
My work was on AGP and VIA drivers, so I am wondering if GRSecurity's
patches a
It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you,
dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some
permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity
for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux
kernel is distri
It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you,
dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some
permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity
for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux
kernel is distri
16 matches
Mail list logo
