Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 29 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > > > Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please? > > Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases > resume works. I thing checking the pa

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please? Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases resume works. I thing checking the patch is hard when I have no real procedure to reproduce the resume fai

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinn

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > > > Now there's a message that I haven't seen in abo

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread David Chinner
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > > Now there's a message that I haven't seen in about 3 years. > > > > > > It indicates that the linux inode con

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > > > On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing > > > > # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk > > # echo disk > /sys/power/state > > This is suspend to RAM, not

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing > > # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk > # echo disk > /sys/power/state This is suspend to RAM, not to disk. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, Dav

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-26 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > No. I'd s

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it > > > reproducable

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it > > > reproducable

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-13 Thread David Chinner
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > [...] > > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it > > reproducable? > > No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such >

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-13 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: [...] > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it > reproducable? No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such failures. I restart squid during the resume prosecure, and the above Oops lead

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-12 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > Hi, > > after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c > printing eip: > c022807f > *pde = > Oops: [#1] > SMP > Modules li

XFS related Oops

2007-11-11 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c printing eip: c022807f *pde = Oops: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp firewire_ohci firewire_core