On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:51:05PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:58:56PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> >> [ 132.638078]
> >> -> #1 (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:58:56PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm hitting an XFS lockdep error with Linus' tree today after the XFS
>> merge. I wasn't hitting this with v3.13-3995-g0dc3fd0, which seems
>> to backup the "before
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:58:56PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm hitting an XFS lockdep error with Linus' tree today after the XFS
> merge. I wasn't hitting this with v3.13-3995-g0dc3fd0, which seems
> to backup the "before XFS merge" claim. Full text below:
Ugh. mmap_sem/inode loc
Hi All,
I'm hitting an XFS lockdep error with Linus' tree today after the XFS
merge. I wasn't hitting this with v3.13-3995-g0dc3fd0, which seems
to backup the "before XFS merge" claim. Full text below:
[ 132.638044] ==
[ 132.638045] [ INFO:
4 matches
Mail list logo