-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> You could also try Xnest, which runs a second X-server within a window
> of
> the primary X-server,
Yes, this is a good idea...
> except without most of the extra overhead of VNC
...but I'm not sure if th
On Feb 05, 2005, at 19:23, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Marko Macek wrote:
[...]
It would be nice if display lock programs used a separate X display
(some kind of "virtual" display support might be nice to have, mainly
for performance).
I would try VNC for this, at least for debugging. Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Marko Macek wrote:
[...]
> It would be nice if display lock programs used a separate X display
> (some kind of "virtual" display support might be nice to have, mainly
> for performance).
I would try VNC for this, at least for de
Otto Wyss wrote:
> No
mouse or keyboard input was possible. I was completely stuck, IMO
something _never_ should happen. Who's to blame for this situation:
wxWidgets, GDB, GCC/G++, X or the Linux kernel? Or any combination?
This is by design in X. XGrabKeyboard and XGrabPointer are usually to
blam
Sorry if this is off topic here but IMO this _has_ to be discussed in a
broader audience since it probably has a rather large impact about the
acceptance of Linux even if it isn't the kernel's fault.
I just build the minimal sample of the wxWidgets framework and it
crashed when playing around with
5 matches
Mail list logo
