Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-04 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > > > please let me know. > > > > I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility > > to let the user cho

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-04 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > > please let me know. > > I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility > to let the user choose when doing "make *config" what he wants: > >

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively larg

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-26 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > please let me know. (I haven't seen even one suggestion posted.. must be a real bugger) I haven't found any silver bullets ;) but the one line bend-adjust below does help the cache problem a

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-24 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Joseph Bueno wrote: > Rik van Riel a écrit : > > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 ap

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-24 Thread Joseph Bueno
Rik van Riel a écrit : > > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large > > amounts o

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-23 Thread Rik van Riel
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large > amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushi

VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-23 Thread Adam Sampson
Hiya. The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushing stuff out to swap. This means that