Re: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-28 Thread Tom Holroyd
> > kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xntpd... > > kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for klogd... > > last message repeated 15 times > > kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for tail... > > last message repeated 15 times > > kernel: VM:

VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-27 Thread Tom Holroyd
Linux 2.2.18, pcmcia-cs-3.1.21, Pentium 75 (100 MHz) Toshiba 420CDS Satellite Pro laptop, 40 MB RAM I can get this to happen reliably: kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xntpd... kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for klogd... last message repeated 15 times kernel: VM

Re: [2.2.18] VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Wednesday, December 20, 2000 13:03:00 +0100 Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last night, one of your production machines got wedged, I caught a lot > of kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... for a whole range of > processes, among them ypbind, klogd,

Re: [2.2.18] VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-20 Thread Matthias Andree
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > How can I get rid of those do_try_to_free_pages lockups? That box > > exports root file systems for some SparcStation 2 that are used as X > > terminals, so it's pretty important I keep that box running. > > > > Should I try the most recent 2.2.19-pre? >

Re: [2.2.18] VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-20 Thread Alan Cox
> How can I get rid of those do_try_to_free_pages lockups? That box > exports root file systems for some SparcStation 2 that are used as X > terminals, so it's pretty important I keep that box running. > > Should I try the most recent 2.2.19-pre? 2.2.19pre2 should resolve that problem - To uns

Re: [2.2.18] VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-20 Thread Ville Herva
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:03:00PM +0100, you [Matthias Andree] claimed: > Last night, one of your production machines got wedged, I caught a lot > of kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... for a whole range of > processes, among them ypbind, klogd, syslogd, xntpd, cron, nscd,

[2.2.18] VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-12-20 Thread Matthias Andree
Last night, one of your production machines got wedged, I caught a lot of kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... for a whole range of processes, among them ypbind, klogd, syslogd, xntpd, cron, nscd, X, master (Postfix super daemon), pvmd3, K applications and so on, I was unable to log in

AW: Got "VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xyz" in 2.2.18pre27

2000-12-11 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Ryan, > This is notice that the do_try_to_free_pages bug is still present in the > latest 2.2 kernel, 2.2.18pre27. > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald... > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald... > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald...

Re: 2.2.18pre25: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for

2000-12-10 Thread Szabolcs Szakacsits
thunder7 wrote: > for almost everything: >Dec 10 13:33:47 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd... [] > watched fsck mull over 60+ Gb> You could try out my patch that "reserves" virtual memory for root, so you should be able to login/ssh and clean

Re: Got "VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xyz" in 2.2.18pre27

2000-12-10 Thread Alan Cox
> This is notice that the do_try_to_free_pages bug is still present in the > latest 2.2 kernel, 2.2.18pre27. > The error also occurs for other processes running on the system. This was > a test with ext3. Journalling file systems will tend to trigger stuff. Im not fixing that for 2.2.18. - To u

Got "VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xyz" in 2.2.18pre27

2000-12-10 Thread Ryan Barnett
This is notice that the do_try_to_free_pages bug is still present in the latest 2.2 kernel, 2.2.18pre27. VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald... VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald... VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kjournald... The error also occurs for other processes

2.2.18pre25: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for

2000-12-10 Thread thunder7
for almost everything: Dec 10 13:33:47 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd... Dec 10 13:33:50 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for gdb... Dec 10 13:33:50 middle last message repeated 9 times Dec 10 13:33:57 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for

RE: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-11-14 Thread Heupink, Mourik Jan C.
; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100 > > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > These if they are odd ones and the box continues are fine, if

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread octave klaba
> Oct 31 12:12:25 mail-client kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for > sendmail > ... > Oct 31 12:12:26 mail-client last message repeated 60 times > Oct 31 12:12:26 mail-client kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for > kupdate. > > To agree with Octave, this only

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Michael Rothwell
I get a similar message with my 2.2.16 kernel: Oct 23 15:02:12 cartman kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd... Oct 23 15:02:12 cartman kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for klogd... Oct 23 15:02:13 cartman kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for nmbd... Oct 23 15:02:13

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Geoff Winkless wrote: > "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [about what I wrote] > > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > > > These if th

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Geoff Winkless wrote: > Hi > > Searching through the archives I found this post on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at > 09:41:13PM +0200 from Octave Klaba > > > Hello, > > On a high load server, kernel has some errors: > > > > VM: do_try_t

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Geoff Winkless
"Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [about what I wrote] > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > These if they are odd ones and the box continues are fine, if you get masses > of them

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Alan Cox
> > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... These if they are odd ones and the box continues are fine, if you get masses of them then probably not > (our quiet periods) the syslog is nearly empty. In extremis it has been

Re: 2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-10-31 Thread Geoff Winkless
Hi Searching through the archives I found this post on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:41:13PM +0200 from Octave Klaba > Hello, > On a high load server, kernel has some errors: > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... > eth0

VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed and frozen system (2.2.17)

2000-10-08 Thread Peter Münster
On On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I get these messages on the root console: > > > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd... > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for syslog-ng... > > VM:

2.2.17 & VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed / eepro100

2000-09-12 Thread octave klaba
Hello, On a high load server, kernel has some errors: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for httpd... eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050. eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status=0x4050. is there somewhere the new version of driver for

Re: 2.2.17pre16 VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed

2000-08-29 Thread Arnaud S . Launay
Le Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:17:53AM +1000, Jim Woodward a écrit: > Aug 26 20:10:18 jim kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for pine... > I've never seen this error before but it doesnt seem to cause any > problems. Any ideas? AFAIK, it comes from memory and swap ex