Catalin Marinas writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:33:01PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:37 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>
>> > >From 0621c7e1909ea86bf8499a0ffe5ea59d1007ee8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Catalin Marinas
>> > Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:30:46
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:33:01PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:37 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > >From 0621c7e1909ea86bf8499a0ffe5ea59d1007ee8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Catalin Marinas
> > Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:30:46 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] kmemle
On 05/15/2013 10:02 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
I do not see that particular one; however, I see 4 instances of
unreferenced object 0x8800b7979750 (size 8):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892402 (age 21888.316s)
hex
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Instead of just picking data sections by name (names that start
> with .data, .bss or .ref.data), use the section flags and scan all
> sections that are allocated, writable and not executable. Which should
> cover all sections of a module
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:37 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >From 0621c7e1909ea86bf8499a0ffe5ea59d1007ee8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:30:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] kmemleak: Scan the jump label module section
>
> Objects allocated in jump_label_
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:02 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > > I do not see that particular one; however
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:02 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > I do not see that particular one; however, I see 4 instances of
> > >
> > > unreferenced object 0x8800
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:02 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
> > I do not see that particular one; however, I see 4 instances of
> >
> > unreferenced object 0x8800b7979750 (size 8):
> >comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892402
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
> I do not see that particular one; however, I see 4 instances of
>
> unreferenced object 0x8800b7979750 (size 8):
>comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892402 (age 21888.316s)
>hex dump (first 8 bytes):
> 31 38 00 b7 0
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:57:03AM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 17:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just got a patch today:
> > > >
> > > > https:
On 05/14/2013 07:57 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 17:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I just got a patch today:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/607
which could be related.
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 17:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >
> > > I just got a patch today:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/607
> > >
> > > which could be related. If Rusty doe
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > I just got a patch today:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/607
> >
> > which could be related. If Rusty doesn't push it I'll do. But please let
> > me know if it does not solve the
On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I just got a patch today:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/607
which could be related. If Rusty doesn't push it I'll do. But please let
me know if it does not solve the problem.
This patch fixes my problem. Now I can see the next new problem repo
On 05/14/2013 02:09 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 15:06 -0400, Larry Finger wrote:
Using v3.10-rc1-68-g2d3ec09, I am getting many instances of the following from
kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0x8800b546dc30 (size 48):
comm "systemd-udevd", pid 2181, jiffies 4294899141
Hi Steve,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 08:09:46PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> # find /debug/tracing/events/ -name format |xargs grep 8800769f7438
> /debug/tracing/events/drm/drm_vblank_event_delivered/format: field:pid_t
> pid;offset:8; size:4; signed:1;8800769f7438
>
> Thus
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 15:06 -0400, Larry Finger wrote:
> Using v3.10-rc1-68-g2d3ec09, I am getting many instances of the following
> from
> kmemleak:
>
> unreferenced object 0x8800b546dc30 (size 48):
>comm "systemd-udevd", pid 2181, jiffies 4294899141 (age 274.096s)
>hex dump (first
Using v3.10-rc1-68-g2d3ec09, I am getting many instances of the following from
kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0x8800b546dc30 (size 48):
comm "systemd-udevd", pid 2181, jiffies 4294899141 (age 274.096s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 dc 46 b5 00 88 ff ff d0 ff 5b a0 ff ff ff ff ..F
18 matches
Mail list logo