On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> I am not an English native but this sentence sounds a bit strange to
>> me ("used" followed by "require" and double "Linux"?).
>> I can imagine what you want to express but have no b
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I am not an English native but this sentence sounds a bit strange to
> me ("used" followed by "require" and double "Linux"?).
> I can imagine what you want to express but have no better wording right now.
>
> 180 + echo -e " This was added s
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>
>>> mcgrof@garbanzo ~/compat (git::master)$ objdump -T
>>> /home/mcgrof/compat-ksrc/lib/modules/3.4.4-030404-generic/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>> mcgrof@garbanzo ~/compat (git::master)$ objdump -T
>> /home/mcgrof/compat-ksrc/lib/modules/3.4.4-030404-generic/build/scripts/genksyms/genksyms
<-- snip -->
>> Bleh:
>>
>> 000
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> A while ago we reviewed the idea of whether or not to use a set of
> distribution vanilla kernels to allow us to do compilation testing of
> modules on the compat backport project [0] with the benefit being that
> at least one Linux distr
A while ago we reviewed the idea of whether or not to use a set of
distribution vanilla kernels to allow us to do compilation testing of
modules on the compat backport project [0] with the benefit being that
at least one Linux distribution was doing this work already and given
that this work was us
6 matches
Mail list logo
