On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > the kernel-part of fuse tells any kernel-level callers to
> > "go away, come back later".
> >
> > obviously this gives time for the kernel-part to "wake up" the
> > userspace daemon, obtain an answer, such that when the kerne
> > There are two choices for the security model in FUSE. The first
> > choice is that the userspace filesystem does the permission checking
> > in each operation. Current uid and gid is available, group list is
> > presently not.
>
> > The other choice is that the kernel does the normal file m
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > *) Last time I looked at FUSE the security model was: If the current uid
> > > equals the owner of the mountpoint then forward the request to the
> > > userland daemon, without any authentication information like for example
> >
> > *) Last time I looked at FUSE the security model was: If the current uid
> > equals the owner of the mountpoint then forward the request to the
> > userland daemon, without any authentication information like for example
> > the current uid. This might have or could be changed though.
>
> as
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:45:08PM +0100, Alexander Bostr?m wrote:
> fre 2005-01-21 klockan 12:22 -0500 skrev Derrick J Brashear:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:00:59AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>
> > >> It seems like Arla would probabl
5 matches
Mail list logo
