viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I did note something strange. I'm running 2.6.11.2 at this moment, when I
> > > tried 2.6.11.3, my USB Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse stopped mov
>-meat-
>> I've also noted .10 is quicker off the blocks than 2.6.11 seems to be.
>
>Namely seems to happen around the times when I'm doing something like
>mounting devfs (takes nearly 30 secs), and when I'm accessing files from
>disc (bash$ less some-random-file.txt) - this can take about two seco
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I did note something strange. I'm running 2.6.11.2 at this moment, when I
> > tried 2.6.11.3, my USB Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse stopped moving
> > from left to right, and would only mo
viking wrote:
Okay - so I see I'm not the only one to see significant slowdowns in 2.6.11.x
compared to 2.6.10 - guess I'll have to wait until the 4-level table thing
sorts itself out...
/me removes foot out of gob.
The 4-level page tables slowdowns don't explain the problems you
are seeing. 2.6.12
Okay - so I see I'm not the only one to see significant slowdowns in 2.6.11.x
compared to 2.6.10 - guess I'll have to wait until the 4-level table thing
sorts itself out...
/me removes foot out of gob.
--
/| _,.:*^*:., |\ Cheers from the Viking family, including Pippin, our cat
| |_/' vik
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I did note something strange. I'm running 2.6.11.2 at this moment, when I
> > tried 2.6.11.3, my USB Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse stopped moving
> > from left to right, and would only mo
viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did note something strange. I'm running 2.6.11.2 at this moment, when I
> tried 2.6.11.3, my USB Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse stopped moving
> from left to right, and would only move up and down if I physically moved
> the mouse from left to right. I d
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:20:04 +0100, viking wrote:
-blather-
> at least I *think* they're Linus' patches - no Visual Basic in them yet.
Guess that means Linus hasn't flipped his lid. So we won't see Linux-4.0
for MSVC any time soon.
Heh he - the ultimate virus would be if a Linux kernel could inst
-blather-
It took a few days before I actually saw this posting. I also agree that
2.6.10 seems to be more stable than 2.6.11 - mind you, that could be
because I'm using 2.6.10-linus (i.e. the tarball from the linux.org site)
and the 2.6.11 is a Mandrake-ised kernel + Linus patches - at least I
*th
9 matches
Mail list logo
