Hello,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > Hey, the world is not only Linux. Sometimes the people build
> > clusters using different hardware and software. If your solution works
> > for your setup we ca
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hey, the world is not only Linux. Sometimes the people build
> clusters using different hardware and software. If your solution works
> for your setup we can't claim it is universal.
It is a Linux News Group after all. So d
Hello,
On 24 Jan 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > Not in Linux 2.2+, all addresses are replied. -arp only
> > means "don't talk ARP", in our case we talk through eth0, so we don't
> > want to stop it, right?
>
> why not? if you hard wire the MAC Address of your web servers to all other
> > In the 2.2 kernel, I could do the following:
> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/hidden
> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/hidden
> >
> > The 2.4 kernel does not have these sysctl files any more. Why was
> > this functionality taken out? or was it simply moved to another place
> >
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> -arp will do that
> Not in Linux 2.2+, all addresses are replied. -arp only
> means "don't talk ARP", in our case we talk through eth0, so we don't
> want to stop it, right?
why not? if you hard wire the MAC Address of your web servers to all ot
Hello,
On 24 Jan 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > The problem is complex and can't be solved with ifconfig -arp
>
> why?
Search for "arp" in the LVS mailing list:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&r=1&w=2
This problem is analyzed from many perspectives. The solutio
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The problem is complex and can't be solved with ifconfig -arp
why?
> The needs for clusters with shared addresses include:
> 1. block ARP replies for such addresses
-arp will do that
> 2. don't announce these addresses in the ARP probes
Hello,
On 22 Jan 2001, Pete Elton wrote:
> In the 2.2 kernel, I could do the following:
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/hidden
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/hidden
>
> The 2.4 kernel does not have these sysctl files any more. Why was
> this functionality taken out? or w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> So in the setup I have, we have an ATM which gets all incoming requests
> for the web site. And then we have 7 other machines that get the
> requests passed onto them by the ATM.
You can hardwire the ARP entry of your redirector to your Router. In that
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The snippet you posted doesn't describe what ClusterThingy exactly wants
> to do with ARPs.
Andi, it is simple. There are 3 machines on one net with the same IP Address.
Two of them run a web server and one of them a packet redirector. The packet
redir
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:27:21PM -0800, Pete Elton wrote:
> > Any ideas on how I can turn off the arping? I guess the thing that I
>
> I explained it in my last mail how to do it using arpfilter. I do not claim
> that it is an elegant solution.
> It's probably not worse a hack than hidden
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:27:21PM -0800, Pete Elton wrote:
> Any ideas on how I can turn off the arping? I guess the thing that I
I explained it in my last mail how to do it using arpfilter. I do not claim
that it is an elegant solution.
It's probably not worse a hack than hidden is in the f
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 03:50:36PM -0800, Pete Elton wrote:
> The snippet you posted doesn't describe what ClusterThingy exactly wants
> to do with ARPs.
Well I think the main difference in what you implemented and
what the cluster server thing is doing (I think) is it sounds
like you can arp
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 03:50:36PM -0800, Pete Elton wrote:
> Is there something that the arp_filter can do that will mirror this
> functionality? The modification that you made to the documentation
> was pretty straight forward in that the arp_filter was BOOLEAN, so
> I think I implemented it
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:50:27AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > Another option is to ifconfig -arp the eth0 interface. I browsed through t
> he
> > IPv4 code and did not find any other goto out which can be configured besi
> des
> > the input FIB, which messing with is a bad thing s
linux-kernel-owner@vger. Subject: Turning off ARP in
linux-2.4.0
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:50:27AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Another option is to ifconfig -arp the eth0 interface. I browsed through the
> IPv4 code and did not find any other goto out which can be configured besides
> the input FIB, which messing with is a bad thing since it wont accept th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Now for the long version of the problem. I am using the TurboLinux
> ClusterServer 6.0 product. This product uses what they refer to as
> an advanced traffic manager that has the ip address of the web site
> aliased to eth0. Thus this machine arps fo
I have searched the previous posts and have not found a solution to
the problem that I am facing.
The short problem is that I need a way to turn off arping for the lo
interface in the 2.4.0 kernel.
In the 2.2 kernel, I could do the following:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/hidden
echo
19 matches
Mail list logo
