On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 06:48:20PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> My controller itself alone handle FOUR device at a time (u mea these
> should be (tfa, b , c d)
> But how do I represent if I have more than one such controller i.e. it
> is more 4 devices each with more parttions again.
Well the scsi a
Dear Lenneart,
>Most common for disk devices is XXYZ where XX is some name for the
>driver (hd for ide, sd for scsi, other things for other drive types), Y
>is a letter (a for first, b for second, c for third, etc) and Z is the
>partition number. So in your case you could have:
>
>tfaa for first
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:03:16PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> Dear Lenneart,
>
> One good news
> I have implemented the partition support in the driver.
> I am able to mount the partition of the individual device.
> I partition them using the fdisk and mounted them.
> The architecture this some th
generalization in the code.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
>-Original Message-
>From: Lennart Sorensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:57 PM
>To: Mukund JB`.
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel-Mailing-list
>Subject: Re: The Linux FAT issue on SD
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:09:06PM +0530, Mukund JB`. wrote:
> To handle it in a similarly in Linux we need to support this driver with
> partitions. There looks a loop hole in the driver.
> I will verify and fix it today.
I suggest having a look at how other drivers use the add_disk call,
since
Dear Lennart,
>> I found that both of then do NOT have the partition table.
>
>If you don't use fdisk to create a partition on the card, then you
won't
>have one.
I am having the partition table on the cam formatted CARD
i.e. the partition 0.
> If you mkdosfs on /dev/tfa0 then you loose the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:21:39PM +0530, Mukund JB`. wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have few updates in this issue.
> I have attached the Images as well as the mount-log to this mail.
> Please see the comments inline.
>
> I think, fdisk it trying to portray that n/o cylinders 448. So, it also
> takes
Dear Lennart,
The USB device I have bought is yet to be tested.
I will do it tomorrow. I was busy in figuring out more on this END. Let
me try it to night.
If not I will try it in the tomorrow day time schedule.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
>> I have bought a "entermultimedia" USB 2.0 21-in-1 card.
>
Dear all,
I have few updates in this issue.
I have attached the Images as well as the mount-log to this mail.
Please see the comments inline.
>If the partition starts at sector 57 and is 28743 sectors long, then
>that matches 28800 sectors total. No problem there.
>
>If on the other hand fdisk r
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:32:03PM +0530, Mukund JB`. wrote:
> A have a new fining here.
>
> fdisk -l -u /dev/tfa0:
> debdev1:~# fdisk -l -u /dev/tfa0
>
> Disk /dev/tfa0: 14 MB, 14680064 bytes
> 2 heads, 32 sectors/track, 448 cylinders, total 28672 sectors Units =
> sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Dear Lennart,
A have a new fining here.
fdisk -l -u /dev/tfa0:
debdev1:~# fdisk -l -u /dev/tfa0
Disk /dev/tfa0: 14 MB, 14680064 bytes
2 heads, 32 sectors/track, 448 cylinders, total 28672 sectors Units =
sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id Sys
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 07:04:34PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> I have bought a "entermultimedia" USB 2.0 21-in-1 card.
> There are no Linux driver support in the CD provided.
> Can u suggest me what is best bug (USB card reader) with Linux driver
> support in the Market.
Load usb drivers and usb-s
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:54:40PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> Yes, I agree. My sentence formation was wrong.
>
> My question here is:
>
> If I have NO multiple partition support implemented in the driver, will
> it effect mounting the first partition on the device?
Yes. If you have no partition
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 07:04:34PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> Dear Lennart,
>
> I have bought a "entermultimedia" USB 2.0 21-in-1 card.
> There are no Linux driver support in the CD provided.
> Can u suggest me what is best bug (USB card reader) with Linux driver
> support in the Market.
It does
Lennart Sorensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:04 PM
>To: Mukund JB.
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel-Mailing-list
>Subject: Re: The Linux FAT issue on SD Cards.. maintainer support
please
>
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0530, Mukund JB. wrot
Dear Lenneart,
Good Morning. Sorry for the delay.
It is Independence Day celebration Week in INDIA. And it's time for my
independence from this problem.
Please see my advances in-lined below.
Work time
---
>> And is it due to lack of partition support in the driver that will
>> affect the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:16:56PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> When I said mount, I guess FAT will read sector 0 to get the partition
> info. And is it due to lack of partition support in the driver that will
> affect the FAT layer reading the device.
> Please update?
No, the kernel read the partit
Dear Lennart,
Thanks for the immediate reply.
Please see inline comments.
>If you don't at least read the partition table to find where the first
>partition starts, then you won't know where to start looking for a FAT
>filesystem.
When I said mount, I guess FAT will read sector 0 to get the par
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:52:31PM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> I dumped the 0th sector of SD when formatted on
> 1) CAM &
> 2) Windows
> The partition table exists on both.
> But, the Master Boot Code is NOT present on the CAM formatted SD but is
> available on windows formatted SD card
Singer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:26 AM
>To: Mukund JB.
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel-Mailing-list
>Subject: Re: The Linux FAT issue on SD Cards.. maintainer support
please
>
>On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
>
Dear Lennart,
I have an update on this. Please see the message indented inline.
>A few things I would try:
>
>Stick the SD card in a generic cheap USB media reader, and see what the
>kernel thinks of the cards then. Do both work?
I do NOT have one. I am getting it today. I will work on it this
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> I am Linux driver programmer.
>
> I have a FAT12 issue on my SD cards. I have got these addresses from the
> fs-lists as the maintainer support mail IDs for FAT-FS.
>
> I am using the 2.6.10 kernel, X86 like systems.
>
> I am NOT abl
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0530, Mukund JB. wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am Linux driver programmer.
>
> I have a FAT12 issue on my SD cards. I have got these addresses from the
> fs-lists as the maintainer support mail IDs for FAT-FS.
>
> I am using the 2.6.10 kernel, X86 like systems.
>
Dear all,
I am Linux driver programmer.
I have a FAT12 issue on my SD cards. I have got these addresses from the
fs-lists as the maintainer support mail IDs for FAT-FS.
I am using the 2.6.10 kernel, X86 like systems.
I am NOT able to mount the Camera formatted FAT12 filesystem on my linux
BOX.
24 matches
Mail list logo
