Re: Sticky IO-APIC problem

2001-07-04 Thread Colin Bayer
"Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can't find an Intel BN810E board at intel.com or by searching >at google.com. Are you sure that's the correct name/ID for it? >Do you have any web page references for it? Sorry, it was an Intel CA810E board. (http://www.intel.com/support/motherboard

Re: Sticky IO-APIC problem

2001-07-03 Thread Colin Bayer
"Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >What mobo (model/name) is it? >Can you give us the output from "lspci -vv"? OK, it's an Intel BN810E Desktop Board; here's the output from lspci -vv: [root@fortytwo /root]# lspci -vv 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82810E GMCH [Graphics Memory C

Re: Sticky IO-APIC problem

2001-07-03 Thread Manfred Spraul
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > This shows that Linux mapped the APIC (part of the processor). > It says nothing about mapping any IO APICs (unless you deleted > that part :). > Correct. Linux always enables the APIC, but it needs some bios tables f

Re: Sticky IO-APIC problem

2001-07-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Colin Bayer scribed: | I have a Pentium III 933/133 (Coppermine, stepping 6) in an Intel-manufactured | i810 motherboard (hey, I What mobo (model/name) is it? Can you give us the output from "lspci -vv"? | know it's a lame chipset, but it was on sale). On boot, the kernel (version | 2.4.6-pre8)

Sticky IO-APIC problem

2001-07-02 Thread Colin Bayer
'K, here's the deal. I have a Pentium III 933/133 (Coppermine, stepping 6) in an Intel-manufactured i810 motherboard (hey, I know it's a lame chipset, but it was on sale). On boot, the kernel (version 2.4.6-pre8) identifies and maps the IO-APIC onboard, but does not assign any IRQs to it. Th