[PATCH v5 16/32] scsi: hisi_sas: add timer and spinlock init

2015-11-17 Thread John Garry
Signed-off-by: John Garry --- drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++ drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h index 3a2400e..3749c46 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/h

[PATCH v4 16/32] scsi: hisi_sas: add timer and spinlock init

2015-11-16 Thread John Garry
Signed-off-by: John Garry --- drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++ drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h index 3a2400e..3749c46 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/h

[PATCH v3 16/32] scsi: hisi_sas: add timer and spinlock init

2015-11-09 Thread John Garry
Signed-off-by: John Garry --- drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++ drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h index e04fd67..146a236 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/h

[PATCH v2 16/32] scsi: hisi_sas: add timer and spinlock init

2015-10-26 Thread John Garry
Signed-off-by: John Garry --- drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h | 2 ++ drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h index 04c2577..0a14994 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/h

[ 010/153] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2013-03-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit 811af9723859884f2f771f3174f3ddedab7c53b5 upstream. It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9cdc7bd

[PATCH 006/139] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2013-02-28 Thread Luis Henriques
3.5.7.7 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit 811af9723859884f2f771f3174f3ddedab7c53b5 upstream. It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9c

[PATCH 137/139] gpio/ich: Add missing spinlock init

2013-02-28 Thread Luis Henriques
3.5.7.7 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit d39a948fef2446cfac3749bbfcfdd536335c3764 upstream. As reported by CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Acked-by: Peter Tyser Signed-off-by: Grant Lik

[ 113/150] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2013-02-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit 811af9723859884f2f771f3174f3ddedab7c53b5 upstream. It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9cdc7bd

[ 63/86] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2013-02-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit 811af9723859884f2f771f3174f3ddedab7c53b5 upstream. It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9cdc7bd

[ 38/53] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2013-02-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jean Delvare commit 811af9723859884f2f771f3174f3ddedab7c53b5 upstream. It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9cdc7bd

Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2013-01-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Jean, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:03:27 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. >> >> Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all sp

Re: [PATCH] gpio-ich: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:51:56 -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: > On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:31 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > As reported by CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > > Cc: Peter Tyser > > Cc: Grant Likely > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org [v3.5+]

Re: [PATCH] gpio-ich: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-19 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:31 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > As reported by CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Peter Tyser > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org [v3.5+] > --- Acked-by: Peter Tyser -- To unsubscribe from this list: send t

[PATCH] pcmcia/vrc4171: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-16 Thread Jean Delvare
It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. This bug was introduced by commit 7a410e8d4d97457c8c381e2de9cdc7bd3306badc. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare --- I can't even build-test this. Already sent on: * 2012-09-06 drivers/pcmcia/vrc4171_card.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-16 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Geert, On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:03:27 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. > > Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all spinlock ops expand to nothing. Can we apply my patch still

[PATCH] gpio-ich: Add missing spinlock init

2012-12-16 Thread Jean Delvare
As reported by CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Peter Tyser Cc: Grant Likely Cc: Linus Walleij Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org [v3.5+] --- Already sent on: * 2012-09-06 drivers/gpio/gpio-ich.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/gpio/g

Re: [PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-09-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. Quiet possible. There's no SMP on m68k, so all spinlock ops expand to nothing. > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Finn Thain > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > I can't even build-test

[PATCH] swim: Add missing spinlock init

2012-09-06 Thread Jean Delvare
It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Finn Thain Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven --- I can't even build-test this. drivers/block/swim.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/block/swim.c 2012-07-21 22:58:29.00

[PATCH] gpio-ich: Add missing spinlock init

2012-09-06 Thread Jean Delvare
As reported by CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Cc: Peter Tyser Cc: Grant Likely Cc: Linus Walleij Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org [v3.5+] --- drivers/gpio/gpio-ich.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-ich.c 2012-09-04 13:34:03.0

Re: Spinlock init

2007-06-20 Thread Jack Stone
Roland Dreier wrote: > > can rwlock_init and spin_lock_init be used outside of functions declared > > __init. The spinlock documentation suggests that it can't but I'd like > > someone to confirm that. > > Those function can be used in any function. A function is declared > __init if it only r

Re: Spinlock init

2007-06-20 Thread Roland Dreier
> can rwlock_init and spin_lock_init be used outside of functions declared > __init. The spinlock documentation suggests that it can't but I'd like > someone to confirm that. Those function can be used in any function. A function is declared __init if it only runs during the kernel startup, so

Spinlock init

2007-06-20 Thread Jack Stone
Dear list, can rwlock_init and spin_lock_init be used outside of functions declared __init. The spinlock documentation suggests that it can't but I'd like someone to confirm that. Sorry if this has already been answered but I couldn't find anything on it. Jack - To unsubscribe from this list: se