Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

2005-04-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 04:17:34PM +0900, tsuchiya yoshihiro wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > >On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 09:42 +0900, tsuchiya yoshihiro wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >>In Fedora Core3, interruptible_sleep_on() checks if the system is >

Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

2005-04-14 Thread tsuchiya yoshihiro
Arjan van de Ven wrote: >On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 09:42 +0900, tsuchiya yoshihiro wrote: > > >>Hi, >>In Fedora Core3, interruptible_sleep_on() checks if the system is >>lock_kernel()'ed >>by SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK. Same thing is done i

Re: SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

2005-04-13 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 09:42 +0900, tsuchiya yoshihiro wrote: > Hi, > In Fedora Core3, interruptible_sleep_on() checks if the system is > lock_kernel()'ed > by SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK. Same thing is done in RedHatEL4. > Also I found a patch including SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK was posted

SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

2005-04-13 Thread tsuchiya yoshihiro
Hi, In Fedora Core3, interruptible_sleep_on() checks if the system is lock_kernel()'ed by SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK. Same thing is done in RedHatEL4. Also I found a patch including SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK was posted before, but is not included in 2.6.11. Why SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK c