Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:48:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
> > ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
> > define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of tha
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:48:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
> ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
> define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of that; I more
> tended to think of it
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does that mean SPARC has a conflict between the 8250/16x50 driver and the
> Zilog driver? If so, the latter should probably move (ttyZ is still an
> unused name.)
If there's a conflict it would be with the minor numbers, which
I haven't been able to c
Stuart MacDonald wrote:
>
> From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
> > > ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
> > > define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of that; I more
> > > tend
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
> > ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
> > define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of that; I more
> > tended to think of it as the "default" se
> Yes you should be able to mix 16x50 chips with sa1100 chips. That is not the
> issue. I believe that people can place any mixture of IC's on a PCB.
Letting it make sense is another issue. Placing a Z80 next to an AMD
Irongate doesn't make sense to me...
> > HPA can I suggest the description
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 06:03:30PM -0400, George France wrote:
>
> Please also read Mike Touloumtzis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] posting in the
> arm-linux-kernel archives. He gets the concept.
Maybe I do, but I thought I was agreeing with Russell :-). Which
only serves to underscore the silliness of
} The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
} ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
} define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of that; I more
} tended to think of it as the "default" serial port for the
} architecture.
}
} It's m
TECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux.u
>
>
> > So now we will have to send our patches to the kernel
> mailing list, setup
> > out own mailing list and web pages. It is not a problem
> s
> So now we will have to send our patches to the kernel mailing list, setup
> out own mailing list and web pages. It is not a problem since we already
> have a web site setup.
Personally I'd rather you accepted that everyone else agrees with Russell about
the major/minor issue and that -both- of
> The only thing I'm not sure is that I believe the SPARC people uses
> ttyS* for Zilog 8530-based serial ports. I don't know if we want to
> define this as NS8250-family serial ports in light of that; I more
> tended to think of it as the "default" serial port for the
> architecture.
>
> It's m
> > believe that no problem can be solved with a flame war
> going on. That is why
> > I decide to stop speaking with him about the serial port
> issue. He then
> > decided to block the e-mails. So here we are.
>
> Well if you arent speaking to him, then it doesnt matter if
> he blocks your
>
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I can see where his confusion arises, but yes you are right, people need to be
> able to mix the 16x50 driver with the sa1100 driver. The ppc people went through
> fixing this.
>
> HP
Hello Alan;
> I can see where his confusion arises, but yes you are right,
> people need to be
> able to mix the 16x50 driver with the sa1100 driver. The ppc
> people went through
> fixing this.
Yes you should be able to mix 16x50 chips with sa1100 chips. That is not the
issue. I believe that
> believe that no problem can be solved with a flame war going on. That is why
> I decide to stop speaking with him about the serial port issue. He then
> decided to block the e-mails. So here we are.
Well if you arent speaking to him, then it doesnt matter if he blocks your
emails..
Alan
-
To
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > > So is there a URL with the whole discussion on. It looks like a fun read ?
> > Have a look at the linux-arm-kernel archive at
> > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-k
> > So is there a URL with the whole discussion on. It looks like a fun read ?
> Have a look at the linux-arm-kernel archive at
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/
I can see where his confusion arises, but yes you are right, people need to be
able to mix the 16x50 driver
17 matches
Mail list logo
