On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
> > breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
> > driver out of git.
>
> I guess, this will
On 10/06/2007 09:29 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
>> revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
>> is for the affected hardware and
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
> revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
> is for the affected hardware and new X.org..
No regressions is more important than
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> I guess, this will break my graphics, no?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447
Can you try it?
We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
is for th
On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
> breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
> driver out of git.
I guess, this will break my graphics, no?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447
> Conflicts:
This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
driver out of git.
Conflicts:
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |5 -
6 matches
Mail list logo
