On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:05:40 +0100, Victor Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> >Processor load we usually handle well, loaded disks are usually the
> >ones that cause >= 0.5 sec delays between bytes received by psmouse.
> >Please let me know if it still works with busy dis
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Processor load we usually handle well, loaded disks are usually the
ones that cause >= 0.5 sec delays between bytes received by psmouse.
Please let me know if it still works with busy disks.
Yes, it does work. I was copying several gigs from one partition to
another and i
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:22:43 +0100, Victor Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> >It still complains in dmesg about throwing away bytes, right? Please try
> >loading the box some more to make sure mouse survives some abuse.
> >
> >
>
> No, it doesn't. The only message I sti
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
It still complains in dmesg about throwing away bytes, right? Please try
loading the box some more to make sure mouse survives some abuse.
No, it doesn't. The only message I still get is the one below. I've
tried it with aprox. 90% CPU usage already and I didn't have any
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 01:08, Victor Hahn wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> >Any luck with the patch?
> >
>
> I'm using 2.6.11rc2 with the patch for some hours now and it seems as if
> it doesn't throw away bytes any more which makes linux 2.6 useable for
> me again - thanks a lot!
It
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Any luck with the patch?
I'm using 2.6.11rc2 with the patch for some hours now and it seems as if
it doesn't throw away bytes any more which makes linux 2.6 useable for
me again - thanks a lot! I just encountered one smaller issue (this
really is much better than before):
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:19, Victor Hahn wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> >Sorry, I think it will apply to 2.6.11-rc2, I'll try to rediff against
> >2.6.10 later tonight.
> >
>
> You don't need to do extra work to make it compatible with 2.6.10, I
> just applied it to 2.6.11-rc2, thanks
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Sorry, I think it will apply to 2.6.11-rc2, I'll try to rediff against
2.6.10 later tonight.
You don't need to do extra work to make it compatible with 2.6.10, I
just applied it to 2.6.11-rc2, thanks. I'm just compiling it now, I'm
looking forward to see the result!
Regard
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:54:37 +0100, Victor Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> thank you for the patch! Unfortunately, I wasn't able to apply it
> correctly, neither to kernel 2.6.10 nor to kernel 2.6.4.
Sorry, I think it will apply to 2.6.11-rc2, I'll try to rediff against
2.6.10 la
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Jan 15 13:33:36 vic kernel: psmouse.c: bad data from KBC - bad
parity Jan 15 13:33:38 vic kernel: psmouse.c: Wheel Mouse at
isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 3 bytes away.
Sometimes, only one of these messages appears; the number of bytes
in the second me
Hi Dmitry,
thank you for the patch! Unfortunately, I wasn't able to apply it
correctly, neither to kernel 2.6.10 nor to kernel 2.6.4. Here's the
error message I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hdb3/Installationsdateien/SOURCES/linux-2.6.10# patch -p1
< /home/victor/patch-mouse.diff
patching file dr
On Saturday 15 January 2005 08:16, Victor Hahn wrote:
> Jan 15 13:33:36 vic kernel: psmouse.c: bad data from KBC - bad parity
> Jan 15 13:33:38 vic kernel: psmouse.c: Wheel Mouse at
> isa0060/serio1/input0 lost
> synchronization, throwing 3 bytes away.
>
> Sometimes, only one of these messages a
Hello,
sorry if this mail goes to the wrong address or if I'm not providing the
right information, but I'm just a regular user, not a hacker.
There is a really annoying bug in PS/2 mouse driver (this is psmouse.c I
think). From time to time, the mouse is just going "crazy", just moving
uncontro
13 matches
Mail list logo
