Re: your mail

2021-04-07 Thread Christian König
Thanks Ray for pointing this out. Looks like the mail ended up in my spam folder otherwise. Apart from that this patch is a really really big NAK. I can't count how often I had to reject stuff like this! Using the page reference for TTM pages is illegal and can lead to struct page corruption

Re: your mail

2021-04-07 Thread Huang Rui
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:27:46AM +0800, songqiang wrote: Please add the description in the commit message and subject. Thanks, Ray > Signed-off-by: songqiang > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c | 18 ++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --g

Re: your mail

2021-04-06 Thread Manivannan Sadhasivam
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:16:09PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v8 0/9] Updates to MHI channel handling > Subject is present in the body ;) > MHI specification shows a state machine with support for STOP channel command > and the validity of certain state transitions. MHI host c

Re: your mail

2021-03-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: $@#@#$%%% Bah! There was another typo in the email list! Take 3 -- Steve

Re: your mail

2021-03-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:21:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Bah! John 'Warthog' Hawley email had those single quotes in it that I cut and pasted into the Cc list, causing the quilt mail parsing to fail, but as LKML was in the "To" part, it still sent! Take 2 -- Steve

Re: your mail

2020-12-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:27:33AM +0900, Yun Levi wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:36 AM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:26:05AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote: ... > > > Side note: speaking of performanc

Re: your mail

2020-12-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:27:33AM +0900, Yun Levi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:36 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:26:05AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote: ... > > Side note: speaking of performance, any plans to fix for_each_*_bit*() for > > cases when the nbits is known

Re: your mail

2020-08-30 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Mon 17 Aug 17:12 UTC 2020, Amit Pundir wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 12:38, Bjorn Andersson > wrote: > > > > On Thu 06 Aug 15:31 PDT 2020, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 > > > (Beryllium) > > > > > > >// This removed_r

Re: your mail

2020-08-17 Thread Amit Pundir
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 12:38, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Thu 06 Aug 15:31 PDT 2020, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 > > (Beryllium) > > > > >// This removed_region is needed to boot the device > > > // TODO: Find

Re: your mail

2020-08-13 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Thu 06 Aug 15:31 PDT 2020, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 > (Beryllium) > > >// This removed_region is needed to boot the device > > // TODO: Find out the user of this reserved memory > > removed_regi

Re: your mail

2020-06-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 07:38:38AM -0400, Gaurav Singh wrote: > Please find the patch below. > > Thanks and regards, > Gaurav. > > >From Gaurav Singh # This line is ignored. > From: Gaurav Singh > Reply-To: > Subject: > In-Reply-To: > > I think something went wrong in your submission, jus

Re: your mail

2020-05-07 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:52:45PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v6] MIPS: Truncate link address into 32bit for 32bit kernel > In-Reply-To: <20200413062651.3992652-1-jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com> > > LLD failed to link vmlinux with 64bit load address for 32bit ELF > while bfd will strip 6

Re: your mail

2019-06-27 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:52:36PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > A small series of tiny cleanups. Applied 1-2 to wq/for-5.3. Thanks. -- tejun

Re: your mail

2019-04-11 Thread Nicholas Piggin
Peter Zijlstra's on April 11, 2019 8:53 pm: > Was this supposed to be patch 6/5 of your previous series? Dang, I screwed up the headers? Thanks for the ping, I will resend. It is standalone. It seems more suited to the scheduler tree than the timers one, but your call. It is generally of more us

Re: your mail

2019-04-11 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Was this supposed to be patch 6/5 of your previous series? On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:05:36PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:23:16 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] kernel/sched: run nohz idle load balancer on HK_FLAG_MISC > CPUs > > The nohz idle balancer runs on the lowest idl

Re: your mail

2019-04-08 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 09:22 -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > -> Share the NVMe device between host and guest. > > Even in fully virtualized configurations, > > some partitions of nvme device could be used by guests as block

Re: your mail

2019-03-26 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 01:17:38PM -0400, William J. Cunningham wrote: > >From bb04b0ca982b7042902fffe1377e0e38e83b402b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Will Cunningham > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:54:34 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Staging: emxx_udc: emxx_udc: Fixed a coding style error > > Removed u

Re: your mail

2019-03-25 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:07:38PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 16:13 +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:45:45 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] RFC: NVME VFIO mediated device > > >

Re: your mail

2019-03-21 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 16:13 +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:45:45 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] RFC: NVME VFIO mediated device > > > > Hi everyone! > > > > In this patch series, I would like to introduc

Re: your mail

2019-03-21 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:45:45 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] RFC: NVME VFIO mediated device > > Hi everyone! > > In this patch series, I would like to introduce my take on the problem of > doing > as fast as possible virtualizati

Re: your mail

2019-03-20 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 11:03 -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 06:30:29PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Or instead I can use the block backend, > > (but note that currently the block back-end doesn't support polling which is > > critical for the performance). > > Oh, I think y

Re: your mail

2019-03-20 Thread Keith Busch
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 06:30:29PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Or instead I can use the block backend, > (but note that currently the block back-end doesn't support polling which is > critical for the performance). Oh, I think you can do polling through there. For reference, fs/io_uring.c has

Re: your mail

2019-03-20 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 23:49 +, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > Hi Keith, > On 03/19/2019 08:21 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > >-> Share the NVMe device between host and guest. > > > Even in fully virtualized configurations, >

Re: your mail

2019-03-20 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 09:22 -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > -> Share the NVMe device between host and guest. > > Even in fully virtualized configurations, > > some partitions of nvme device could be used by guests as block

Re: your mail

2019-03-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:20:01PM -0600, George Hilliard wrote: > Because of this change, the driver now expects a pinctrl device > reference in the mmc controller's device tree node; without it, it will > bail out. This could break existing setups that don't specify it > because it "just worked"

Re: your mail

2019-03-19 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni
Hi Keith, On 03/19/2019 08:21 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: >>-> Share the NVMe device between host and guest. >> Even in fully virtualized configurations, >> some partitions of nvme device could be used by guests as block d

Re: your mail

2019-03-19 Thread Keith Busch
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > -> Share the NVMe device between host and guest. > Even in fully virtualized configurations, > some partitions of nvme device could be used by guests as block devices > while others passed through with nvme-mdev to

Re: your mail

2019-02-26 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:16:29PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > [resending, rebased on top of latest mmots] > > The memcg LRU stats usage is currently a bit messy. Memcg has private > per-zone counters because reclaim needs zone granularity sometimes, > but we also have plenty of users that nee

Re: your mail

2018-07-25 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:22:07AM +0300, Georgios Tsotsos wrote: > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 01:18:58 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Staging: octeon-usb: Fixes and Coding style applied. > > Hello, Somehow your subject here got messed up and put in the bod of the email. Not a big deal this time, but

Re: your mail

2018-06-19 Thread Dan Carpenter
Thanks for this. This is a lot of work. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 08:31:28PM +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c > index 70e0b8623110..69e6abe14abf 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/r

Re: your mail

2017-12-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:26:14AM -0800, Alexander Kappner wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:28:37 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] usb-core: Fix potential null pointer dereference in > xhci-debugfs.c Something went wrong here, resulting in an email with no subject. Can you fix this up and resend? tha

Re: your mail

2017-08-18 Thread Rajneesh Bhardwaj
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:12:14PM +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote: > Bcc: > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Package C-states > residency info > Reply-To: > In-Reply-To: > > Please ignore my previous email without subject. It was sent by mistake. > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017

Re: your mail

2017-06-14 Thread Yury Norov
Hi Catalin, all. Thank you for your time on reviewing the series. I really appreciate it. This is the updated version where I tried to address all comments: https://github.com/norov/linux/commits/ilp32-20170613.4 (3 last patches here is the Andrew Pinski's rework of vdso rebased on ilp32 series)

Re: your mail

2017-04-27 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 27-04-17 11:08:38, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > You are trying to change a semantic of something that has a well > > > > > > defined > > > > > > meaning. I disagree that we should change it. It might so

Re: your mail

2017-04-26 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > > > You are trying to change a semantic of something that has a well > > > > > defined > > > > > meaning. I disagree that we should change it. It might sound like a > > > > > simpler thing to do because pfn walk

Re: your mail

2017-04-26 Thread Michal Hocko
On Tue 25-04-17 11:50:45, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:53:12AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 24-04-17 10:44:43, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Fri 21-04-17 13:38:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Ap

Re: your mail

2017-04-24 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:53:12AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 24-04-17 10:44:43, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Fri 21-04-17 13:38:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > >

Re: your mail

2017-04-24 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 24-04-17 10:44:43, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 21-04-17 13:38:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Ap

Re: your mail

2017-04-23 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 21-04-17 13:38:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > >

Re: your mail

2017-04-21 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 21-04-17 13:38:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > Which pfn walkers you have in mind? > > > > > > For ex

Re: your mail

2017-04-20 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > Which pfn walkers you have in mind? > > > > For example, kpagecount_read() in fs/proc/page.c. I searched it b

Re: your mail

2017-04-20 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 20-04-17 13:56:34, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/20/2017 10:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 20-04-17 09:28:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > [...] > >>> Your patch try to add PageReserved() to __pageblock_pfn_to_page(). It > >>> woule make t

Re: your mail

2017-04-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 04/20/2017 10:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 20-04-17 09:28:20, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > [...] >>> Your patch try to add PageReserved() to __pageblock_pfn_to_page(). It >>> woule make that zone->contiguous usually returns false since memory >>> u

Re: your mail

2017-04-20 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 20-04-17 09:28:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: [...] > > Your patch try to add PageReserved() to __pageblock_pfn_to_page(). It > > woule make that zone->contiguous usually returns false since memory > > used by memblock API is marked as PageReserved() a

Re: your mail

2017-04-20 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Which pfn walkers you have in mind? > > For example, kpagecount_read() in fs/proc/page.c. I searched it by > using pfn_valid(). Yeah, I've checked that one and in fact this is a

Re: your mail

2017-04-19 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 17-04-17 14:47:20, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 02:17:31PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > here I 3 more preparatory patches which I meant to send on Thursday but > > > forgot... After more thinking

Re: your mail

2017-04-17 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 17-04-17 14:47:20, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 02:17:31PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi, > > here I 3 more preparatory patches which I meant to send on Thursday but > > forgot... After more thinking about pfn walkers I have realized that > > the current code doesn't chec

Re: your mail

2017-04-16 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 02:17:31PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > here I 3 more preparatory patches which I meant to send on Thursday but > forgot... After more thinking about pfn walkers I have realized that > the current code doesn't check offline holes in zones. From a quick > review that do

Re: your mail

2016-11-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:25:43AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:40:14 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On top of which, the implementation had issues; now I know you're the > > blinder kind of person that disregards everything not in his immediate > > interest, but

Re: your mail

2016-11-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:40:14 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On top of which, the implementation had issues; now I know you're the > blinder kind of person that disregards everything not in his immediate > interest, but if you'd looked at the patch you'd have seen he'd added > code the idle entry

Re: your mail

2016-11-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:29:16PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > There is a deadlock, Peter!!! > > > > Describe please? Also, have you tried disabling RT_RUNTIME_SHARE ? > > > > > The description was given earlier in the the thread and the drawbacks of > using RT_RUNTIME_SHARE as well.

Re: your mail

2016-09-20 Thread andrew banman
Subject line got dropped the first time around. Will send again. Apologies for the chatter, Andrew On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:21:06PM -0500, Andrew Banman wrote: > From Andrew Banman # This line is ignored. > From: Andrew Banman > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] arch/x86/platform/uv: add UV4 support to B

Re: your mail

2015-08-03 Thread Dan Carpenter
Returning EINVAL here is the wrong thing. Just leave the code as is. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please r

Re: your mail

2015-08-03 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:48:59AM +0530, Shraddha Barke wrote: > From b67c6c20455b04b77447ab4561e44f1a75dd978d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Shraddha Barke > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:34:19 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Staging : lustre : Use -EINVAL instead of -ENOSYS You do not need these in the

Re: your mail

2015-01-28 Thread atull
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > [unfutzd the cc a bit, sorry] > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:19:17PM -0600, atull wrote: > > > If we consider a Zynq, for instance, there are a number of clock nets > > > that the CPU drives into the FPGA fabric. These nets are controlled by > > > the

Re: your mail

2015-01-22 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
> The functions above are fine for a generic manufacturer bitfile loader, > ie Xilinx GPIO twiddling, Altera JTAG, Zynq DMA, etc. > > But wrappered around that should be another set of functions that are > bitfile specific. And also a transport layer. You can have the same FPGA with the same load

Re: your mail

2015-01-21 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
[unfutzd the cc a bit, sorry] On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:19:17PM -0600, atull wrote: > > If we consider a Zynq, for instance, there are a number of clock nets > > that the CPU drives into the FPGA fabric. These nets are controlled by > > the kernel CLK framework. So, before we program the FPGA bit

Re: your mail

2014-10-27 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Christoph. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:10:37AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Subject: Convert remaining __get_cpu_var uses > > During the 3.18 merge period additional __get_cpu_var uses were > added. The patch converts these to this_cpu_ptr(). > > [This does not address the powerpc iss

Re: your mail

2014-09-01 Thread Dan Carpenter
No subject. It should be a subject about adding spaces. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ

Re: your mail

2014-09-01 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:34:56PM +0800, sunwxg wrote: > From: Sun Wang > > Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorutil: procobjecttree: fix coding style > issue > Your email headers are mangled. The subject is vague. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: your mail

2014-07-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:03:32AM +0900, James Ban wrote: > > > + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, DA9211_REG_EVENT_B, ®_val); > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > + goto error_i2c; > > > + if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_A) { > > > + if (reg_val & DA9211_E_OV_CURR_B) { > > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;

Re: your mail

2014-02-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:20:11AM +, srikanth TS wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2014 2:28 AM, "Will Deacon" > mailto:will.dea...@arm.com>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +, srikanth TS wrote: > > > Hi Will Deacon, > > > > Hello, > > > > > Currently SMMU driver expecting all str

RE: your mail

2014-02-25 Thread Varun Sethi
samsung.com; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; ts.srika...@samsung.com > Subject: Re: your mail > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +, srikanth TS wrote: > > Hi Will Deacon, > > Hello, > > > Currently SMMU driver expecting all stream ID used by respective > &g

Re: your mail

2014-02-24 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +, srikanth TS wrote: > Hi Will Deacon, Hello, > Currently SMMU driver expecting all stream ID used by respective master > should be defined in the DT. > > We want to know how to handle in the case of virtual functions dynamically > created and destroyed. >

Re: your mail

2014-01-23 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:36:05PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > Hi Mark, Please use a subject line for your e-mails, otherwise they look a lot like spam. > So currently I am booting it traditional way (NON DT way) and > regulator_dev_lookup() > fails (return NULL) and for this check it fails.

Re: your mail

2014-01-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:49:39PM +, Joe Bor?? wrote: > > I didn't do the changes as root, I sent them from my server as it has SMTP > out. > Hmm, this gives me an idea. There's nothing, I believe, that makes the root user have to have the name "root" except for the passwd file. Maybe I'll

Re: your mail

2014-01-09 Thread Joe Borġ
Hi Greg, I'll re do them tonight. I didn't do the changes as root, I sent them from my server as it has SMTP out. Thanks Regards, Joseph David Borġ http://www.jdborg.com On 9 January 2014 18:39, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 05:40:44PM +, Joe Borg wrote: >> >From 6d9f6446434c4

Re: your mail

2014-01-09 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 05:40:44PM +, Joe Borg wrote: > >From 6d9f6446434c4021cc9452e31c374ac50e08f0f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Joe Borg This isn't matching your "from:" line on your email, why should I trust it? And doing kernel work as 'root'? That's not a good idea for lots of re

Re: your mail

2012-11-26 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:14:44PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > Hello, Greg. Hello kernel team! I'm system enginer at clodo.ru (russian cloud > hosting provider) we are use xen and sles11-sp2 for our compute xen nodes. > Each virtual machine (domU) have disks that attached by Infiniband SRP. On

Re: your mail

2012-10-10 Thread Kent Yoder
Please ignore. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:06:53AM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote: > The following changes since commit ecefbd94b834fa32559d854646d777c56749ef1c: > > Merge tag 'kvm-3.7-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm > (2012-10-04 09:30:33 -0700) > > are available in the git reposito

Re: your mail

2012-10-04 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > So we could drop page_autonuma by creating a CONFIG_SLUB=y dependency > (AUTONUMA wouldn't be available in the kernel config if SLAB=y, and it > also wouldn't be available on 32bit archs but the latter isn't a > problem). Nope it should depend on page

Re: your mail

2012-08-08 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:43:45AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > delayed_work has been annoyingly missing the mechanism to modify timer > of a pending delayed_work - ie. mod_timer() counterpart. delayed_work > users have been working around this using several methods - using an > explicit timer + work

Re: your mail

2007-10-17 Thread nicholas . thompson1
r using cut and paste while tired and before my third cup of coffee. ;p Apologies. Nick >>On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:36:19PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:36:19 +0200 (CEST) >> From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: [EMAIL PR

Re: your mail

2007-10-17 Thread Matti Aarnio
dt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: your mail > > On Oct 17 2007 16:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:30:24 + > >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: >

Re: your mail

2007-10-17 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 17 2007 16:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:30:24 + >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: ^^ > >subscribe linux-alpha ^ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: your mail

2007-09-24 Thread Steven Rostedt
-- On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bcc: > Subject: Re: realtime preemption performance difference > Reply-To: > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ I'm actually just learning how to screw-up^Wuse mutt ] bah! -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: your mail

2007-08-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:06:00AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > that are: > > while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) { > mdelay(1); > msecs--; > } > > where mdelay() becomes __const_udelay() which happens to be in another > translati

Re: your mail

2007-05-16 Thread Bob Picco
Olof Johansson wrote: [Wed May 16 2007, 01:11:00PM EDT] > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:43:41AM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:30:46AM -0400, Bob Picco wrote: > > > Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 powerpc build breakage > > > > > > /usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1/drivers/pci/h

Re: your mail

2007-05-16 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:43:41AM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:30:46AM -0400, Bob Picco wrote: > > Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 powerpc build breakage > > > > /usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_sysfs.c:132: > > error: unknown field `subsys' spec

Re: your mail

2007-05-16 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:30:46AM -0400, Bob Picco wrote: > Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 powerpc build breakage > > /usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpadlpar_sysfs.c:132: > error: unknown field `subsys' specified in initializer > /usr/src/linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1/drivers/pci/hotplug/

Re: your mail

2007-03-29 Thread Gerard Braad
Sorry, this wasn't supposed to happen. Already done... Unsubscribed due to lack of a digest mail. I wonder why people can't send their unsubscribe message to the same address they sent their subscribe message to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the b

Re: your mail

2007-03-29 Thread David Miller
From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:42:17 +0200 (MEST) > > unsubscribe linux-kernel .. > > I wonder why people can't send their unsubscribe message to the same > address they sent their subscribe message to. People get frustrated that it doesn't work then start do

Re: your mail

2007-03-29 Thread Jan Engelhardt
> > unsubscribe linux-kernel .. I wonder why people can't send their unsubscribe message to the same address they sent their subscribe message to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http:

Re: your mail

2007-02-06 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > On 2/5/07, Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hmm, this seems to be the same issue as in [1] and [2]. A page that is > >assumed to belong to the slab but is not longer marked as a slab page. > >Could this be a bu

Re: your mail

2007-02-05 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi Joerg, On 2/5/07, Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm, this seems to be the same issue as in [1] and [2]. A page that is assumed to belong to the slab but is not longer marked as a slab page. Could this be a bug in the memory management? The BUG_ON triggers whenever you feed an inva

Re: your mail

2007-02-05 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:41:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Good morning, > > I am experiencing a bug i think. I am running a 2.6.19.2 kernel on a 3Ghz > Intel with HT activated, 1 gb ram, and noname motherboard. Here is the > output of the hang: Hmm, this seems to be the same issue as i

Re: your mail

2005-02-03 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Aleksey Gorelov wrote: > Hi Matt, Alan, > > Could you please tell me (link would do) why it makes default > delay_use=5 > really necessary (from the patch below)? > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2004-August/00074 > 7.html > > It makes USB boot rea

Re: your mail

2005-02-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
It's basically just like the code says. A lot of devices choke if you access them too quickly after enumeration. The 5 second delay seems to be enough for most devices. But we made it adjustable exactly for people like you. Matt On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:17:13PM -0800, Aleksey Gorelov wrote: >

Re: your mail

2001-06-18 Thread Jan Hudec
> So it seems that PnP finds the card, but the connections (or even the > forced values) to the sb module fail. Back when this was a single > processor machine, but still running 2.4 kernel, a windoze > installation found the SB at the listed interface parameters. > > > Anyone have a solution?

Re: your mail

2001-06-13 Thread Luigi Genoni
I have the sound blaster 16 card on one of my athlon (on PIII i have es1731), that has one isa slot on its MB. It works well, but i do not use isapnp nor any pnp support is enabled inside of the kernel. running 2.4.5/2.4.6-pre2 Luigi On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colonel wrote: > From: Colonel <[EMAIL

Re: your mail

2001-05-31 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > BTW, linux-kernel readers: anybody is a volunteer for making the kernel size > counter 32-bit here? This would enable using the simple bootloader for > greater kernel load

Re: your mail

2001-05-31 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
> > Minor issue with bootsect.s. 1. bootsect.S is the source file > The single instance of the lds assembly instruction includes the comment of > ! ds:si is source > ... > seg fs > lds si,(bx)! ds:si is source > ... > Is this comment not in reverse order (i.e should be lds > dest,

Re: your mail

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas Palm
1. The corrupted files have the same length but differ (I cannot say on what bit-position) 2. I reproduced the problem while burning CD from SCSI-Disk to SCSI-CD-Burner!!! -> It´s definetly not a (single?) IDE-Problem Burning CD (on slow 4x speed) seems to initialize many small transfers (instead

Re: your mail

2001-05-21 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Thomas Palm wrote: > there ist still file-corruption. I use an ASUS A7V133 (Revision 1.05, > including Sound + Raid). My tests: > 1st run of "diff -r srcdir destdir" -> no differs > 2nd run of "diff -r srcdir destdir" -> 2 files differ > 3rd run of "diff -r srcdir destdir" ->

Re: your mail

2001-05-16 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:05:38AM -0700, siva prasad wrote: > Is it true that the ipc calls like > msgget(),shmget()... > are not really system calls? No, they all use a system call, but the system call is the same for all functions. > Cos in the file "asm/unistd.h" where the > system calls ar

Re: your mail

2001-05-09 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, May 08 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > Use a kernel thread? If you don't need to access user space, context > > > switches are very cheap. > > > > > > > So, what am I supposed to do to add a piece of driver code to the > > > > run queue so it

Re: your mail

2001-05-08 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I have a driver which needs to wait for some hardware. > > Basically, it needs to have some code added to the run-queue > > so it can get some CPU time even though it's not being called. > > Wht does it have to wait ? Why cant it just poll and come back ne

Re: your mail

2001-05-08 Thread Alan Cox
> I have a driver which needs to wait for some hardware. > Basically, it needs to have some code added to the run-queue > so it can get some CPU time even though it's not being called. Wht does it have to wait ? Why cant it just poll and come back next time ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: your mail

2001-05-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, May 08 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > Use a kernel thread? If you don't need to access user space, context > > switches are very cheap. > > > > > So, what am I supposed to do to add a piece of driver code to the > > > run queue so it gets scheduled occasionally? > > > > Several, gre

Re: your mail

2001-05-08 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, May 08 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > > To driver wizards: > > > > I have a driver which needs to wait for some hardware. > > Basically, it needs to have some code added to the run-queue > > so it can get some CPU time even though it's not

  1   2   >