On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Samu Kallio wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:35:52AM -, Samu Kallio wrote:
> >> In paravirtualized x86_64 kernels, vmalloc_fault may cause an oops
> >> when lazy MMU updates are ena
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:35:52AM -, Samu Kallio wrote:
>> In paravirtualized x86_64 kernels, vmalloc_fault may cause an oops
>> when lazy MMU updates are enabled, because set_pgd effects are being
>> deferred.
>>
>> One instance
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:35:52AM -, Samu Kallio wrote:
> In paravirtualized x86_64 kernels, vmalloc_fault may cause an oops
> when lazy MMU updates are enabled, because set_pgd effects are being
> deferred.
>
> One instance of this problem is during process mm cleanup with memory
> cgroups e
3 matches
Mail list logo