> James has just posted a big patch against this code, so you should
> coordinate this with him.
>
> One point: you should have included linux/spinlock.h rather than
> asm/spinlock.h. Obviously someone is already including this file, so
> you can simply remove the #include altogether.
I alread
Yong Chi wrote:
>
> My first contribution to kernel =) Someone please look over this one
> carefully =)
That's a good patch.
It is "obviously correct", it saves seven calls to __global_cli() for
each \n-terminated write to the console and it fixes the
death-with-dual-deadlock problem which Mis
2 matches
Mail list logo
