Ingo Molnar wrote:
> and your solution: you advocate destroying information by pulling it off
> lkml
I did not propose to pull anything off of LKML.
I argued that LKML's topic is not a true superset of some of those other
lists' topics, hence cannot truly replace those lists.
--
Stefan Richter
(a late reply - the merge window made me ignore this thread ;-)
* Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (or if that's still too much, follow the time-deferred lkml updates
> > of lwn.net)
> >
> > Realize it: it's _far_ easier to filter down a too verbose source of
> > information, tha
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:31:01 +0100, Stefan Richter said:
> Does your laptop have for example chained sg lists? :-)
Beats me - I don't see it on an 'lspci' ;) But I'm pretty sure it doesn't
have a 'powerpc' in it, so those threads get *totally* skipped...
My point was "personal interest in the d
David Miller wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:28:20 +0100
>
>> Filter on all mails from David S. Miller if you are interested in
>> networking topics. You'll have a really good grasp of what's going on in
>> that area, without having to invest too much t
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [...] How will subscribers of LKML decide which discussion threads in
>> the huge amount of traffic are worth to glance at? Each of us has
>> only a limited amount of time for LKML consumption.
>
> uhm. How do you decide whi
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:28:20 +0100
> Filter on all mails from David S. Miller if you are interested in
> networking topics. You'll have a really good grasp of what's going on in
> that area, without having to invest too much time.
That's a very poor filt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:42:43 +0100, Stefan Richter said:
>
>> Even if you only look at the Subject: and number of postings in a
>> thread, how to judge whether there is a stability risk for the next -rc
>> in the making, without experience or personal interest in the dom
* Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] How will subscribers of LKML decide which discussion threads in
> the huge amount of traffic are worth to glance at? Each of us has
> only a limited amount of time for LKML consumption.
uhm. How do you decide which of the 1 git commits p
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:42:43 +0100, Stefan Richter said:
> Even if you only look at the Subject: and number of postings in a
> thread, how to judge whether there is a stability risk for the next -rc
> in the making, without experience or personal interest in the domain?
My general rule of thumb i
9 matches
Mail list logo
