On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:26, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:29:20 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Remember that dmesg diff you sent? That's the one. If you strace
> > > the digikamcameracl, it probably keels over after EBUSY.
> >
> > Nice shot! Got it in one. bugzill
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:29:20 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Remember that dmesg diff you sent? That's the one. If you strace
> > the digikamcameracl, it probably keels over after EBUSY.
>
> Nice shot! Got it in one. bugzilla updated with confirmation.
>
> So how do we proceed
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:56, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:42:12 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:00, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:06 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Yes all those dmesgs etc were
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:42:12 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:00, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:06 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes all those dmesgs etc were redone after it failed in rc6 as I needed it
> working. Oh and
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:00, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:06 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A digital camera which was working fine in 2.6.11/12 now fails on
> > 2.6.13-rc6 (not sure when it started failing).
>
> Does it continue to work on an older kernel? I saw
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:06 +1000, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A digital camera which was working fine in 2.6.11/12 now fails on 2.6.13-rc6
> (not sure when it started failing).
Does it continue to work on an older kernel? I saw a USB device breaking
right in the moment of reboot i
6 matches
Mail list logo