Hi Linus,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> > symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...
>
> Well, as far as I'm concerned, you co
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then
> > > we
> > > need some reliable way of working that out within Kconfig.
> >
> > Isn't that CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM?
>
> No, having memory mapped I/O doesn't mean you have PCI
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> > symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...
>
> Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all d
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...
Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all drivers that
actually need "check_signature()" d
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:31:08PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> And we'll all live with a check_signature() in our kernel, which is used
> only by a few legacy drivers that depend on ISA || PCI...
>
> OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> symbol for lots of ot
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > M68k uses I/O memory for all I/O (hence it sets CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM), but
> > many m68k machines don't have PCI or ISA (hence it doesn't set
> > CONFIG_PCI resp. CONFIG_ISA).
>
> It doesn't matter whether
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> M68k uses I/O memory for all I/O (hence it sets CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM), but
> many m68k machines don't have PCI or ISA (hence it doesn't set
> CONFIG_PCI resp. CONFIG_ISA).
It doesn't matter whether the machine has PCI or ISA. The only thing that
m
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I saw this patch went in.
> >
> > iomap_copy.o ues the raw I/O memory accessors, so it truly depends on
> > CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM.
>
> This works for UML.
Of course. UML (and s390) doesn't
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I saw this patch went in.
>
> iomap_copy.o ues the raw I/O memory accessors, so it truly depends on
> CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM.
This works for UML.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscri
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then
> > > we
> > > need some reliable way of working that out
Hi Heiko,
On 7/17/07, Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm.. this breaks s390 and probably m68k and UML as well:
CC lib/check_signature.o
lib/check_signature.c: In function 'check_signature':
lib/check_signature.c:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'readb'
Just to con
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then
> > > we
> > > need some reliable way of working that out within Kconfig.
> >
>
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then we
> > need some reliable way of working that out within Kconfig.
>
> Isn't that CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM?
No, having memory mapped I/O doesn
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then we
> > need some reliable way of working that out within Kconfig.
>
> Isn't that CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM?
That was
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> No, no revert, please. If the architecture doesn't support readb() then we
> need some reliable way of working that out within Kconfig.
Isn't that CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:12:57 +0200
Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:02:55PM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cc2ea416b2aa04d0c34ff2281a23dae5b76b7b3b
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:02:55PM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Gitweb:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cc2ea416b2aa04d0c34ff2281a23dae5b76b7b3b
> Commit: cc2ea416b2aa04d0c34ff2281a23dae5b76b7b3b
> Parent: 4e7bd66318b3ae60f
17 matches
Mail list logo