Hi Mikie,
> Do you have any news regarding my case of slow transfers via
> Speedtouch USB modem on linux ?
I found my old speedtouch modem and tested here. I got 2.1 Mbaud
bulk downspeed, and 3 Mbaud isoc downspeed. This last is half the
speed my line supports, so something is wrong [*]. Unfor
Hello Duncan,
Do you have any news regarding my case of slow transfers via
Speedtouch USB modem on linux ?
--
Regards,
MK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo
2007/7/11, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
> Actually I had to mount it (I hope that not having it mounted does
> not change a lot in this matter).
probably not. Not having sysfs mounted can cause hotplug to fail,
but I think not having /proc/bus/usb mounted shouldn't cause any
trouble
Hi,
> Actually I had to mount it (I hope that not having it mounted does
> not change a lot in this matter).
probably not. Not having sysfs mounted can cause hotplug to fail,
but I think not having /proc/bus/usb mounted shouldn't cause any
trouble nowadays.
> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 3 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(v
2007/7/11, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Mikie,
> I begin to think that the isochronous mode is not working. I tried the
> speedtch module with disabled and enabled isoc and there is no
> difference in transfer speeds at all.
>
> All I checked was :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /sys/module/
Hi Mikie,
> I begin to think that the isochronous mode is not working. I tried the
> speedtch module with disabled and enabled isoc and there is no
> difference in transfer speeds at all.
>
> All I checked was :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /sys/module/speedtch/parameters/enable_isoc
> Y
>
> which
2007/7/10, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2007 11:13:09 mikie wrote:
> > 2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > I also tried a couple of other firmwares available on the net, and
> > > > also the one from Windows XP insta
2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 11:13:09 mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I also tried a couple of other firmwares available on the net, and
> > > also the one from Windows XP install (which works and achieves speeds
> > > of u
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 11:13:09 mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I also tried a couple of other firmwares available on the net, and
> > > also the one from Windows XP install (which works and achieves speeds
> > > of up to 720kbyte/sec downlink). Some of the firmwa
2007/7/10, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I also tried a couple of other firmwares available on the net, and
> also the one from Windows XP install (which works and achieves speeds
> of up to 720kbyte/sec downlink). Some of the firmwares did not work
> either, and some worked the same way -
> I also tried a couple of other firmwares available on the net, and
> also the one from Windows XP install (which works and achieves speeds
> of up to 720kbyte/sec downlink). Some of the firmwares did not work
> either, and some worked the same way - it means not more than 3mbit/s
> (around 400kby
2007/7/9, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One more thing - when the modem finally runs in isochronous mode, yet
> I cannot get high transfer rates. I can't get nothing more than
> 3Mbits/s. When I used kernel 2.4 with bulk mode I had only 2.5 Mbit/s.
> So there is a little progress, but still
Hi,
> > Is it actually running in isochronous mode? (It prints some messages
> > about this).
>
> This is what I get:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /sys/module/speedtch/parameters/enable_isoc
> Y
>
> I think it means it confirms the isochronous mode is working.
> Especially that I modified the so
2007/7/9, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One more thing - when the modem finally runs in isochronous mode, yet
> I cannot get high transfer rates. I can't get nothing more than
> 3Mbits/s. When I used kernel 2.4 with bulk mode I had only 2.5 Mbit/s.
> So there is a little progress, but still
2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, July 9, 2007 16:40, mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/9, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 7/9/07, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > 2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
>> > > > 2007/7/6,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 16:40 +0200, mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/9, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 7/9/07, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
> > > > > 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
On Mon, July 9, 2007 16:40, mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/9, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 7/9/07, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > 2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
>> > > > 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > >> On
2007/7/9, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/9/07, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
> > > 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > >> > O
On 7/9/07, mikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
> > 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
> >> > On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
> >> >> Hi
2007/7/9, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> > On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I experience some problems with the spee
2007/7/9, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
> On my system the /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug points to /sbin/hotplug.
> I copied your script to /sbin/hotplug and also added simple logging,
> so I can see whenever the script is being started. It turns out that
> the script is not started at all by
Hi,
> On my system the /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug points to /sbin/hotplug.
> I copied your script to /sbin/hotplug and also added simple logging,
> so I can see whenever the script is being started. It turns out that
> the script is not started at all by the kernel...
did you turn hotplug on in you
On Mon, July 9, 2007 10:49, mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> > On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I experience some problems with the speedtch.c module, especially in
>> >> regards to it
2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
> On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I experience some problems with the speedtch.c module, especially in
>> regards to its firmware loader.
>> I am not quite sure if this module is
2007/7/6, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, you should keep this discussion on the lkml so it will be archived -
that way it may help others too.
I was sure I copied lkml, but obviously something went wrong.
On Friday 6 July 2007 19:06:14 mikie wrote:
> 2007/7/6, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
> On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I experience some problems with the speedtch.c module, especially in
>> regards to its firmware loader.
>> I am not quite sure if this module is going to load the firmware
>> itself or does it
On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I experience some problems with the speedtch.c module, especially in
> regards to its firmware loader.
> I am not quite sure if this module is going to load the firmware
> itself or does it use some external software to do that ?
It loads it i
27 matches
Mail list logo
