On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman
wrote:
> Aditya Kali writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Eric W. Biederman
>> wrote:
>>> Aditya Kali writes:
>>>
Hi all,
I am trying to run a process with uid=0 inside userns. But in the when
I also do capset() aft
Aditya Kali writes:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
>> Aditya Kali writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to run a process with uid=0 inside userns. But in the when
>>> I also do capset() after setresuid(0, 0, 0), I am seeing inconsistent
>>> proc file permissi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Eric W. Biederman
wrote:
> Aditya Kali writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to run a process with uid=0 inside userns. But in the when
>> I also do capset() after setresuid(0, 0, 0), I am seeing inconsistent
>> proc file permissions. Almost all the files in /pro
Aditya Kali writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to run a process with uid=0 inside userns. But in the when
> I also do capset() after setresuid(0, 0, 0), I am seeing inconsistent
> proc file permissions. Almost all the files in /proc// has global
> 'root' as owner and group even if the actual proce
OK - I fixed the formatting and checked into the cifs-2.6.git tree. I
also fixed
a few dozen similar errors in formatting in the same files.
Thanks for noticing that.
On 4/30/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:26:16 -0500 Steve French wrote:
replying to the inl
The CIFS Unix Extensions are used by multiple clients now (not just
Linux) but originally I thought that it might be confusing to Linux
users to call the configuration setting for that in /proc/fs/cifs
"Unix" instead of "Linux" (and since it has been there for years and
is externally visible, it
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:26:16 -0500 Steve French wrote:
replying to the inline patch :(
Use a space between "if" and "(" (multiple occurrences).
Thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
On 30 Apr 2007, at 15:26, Steve French wrote:
When CIFS Unix Extensions are negotiated we get the Unix uid and gid
owners of the file from the server (on the Unix Query Path Info
levels), but if the server's uids don't match the client uid's users
were having to disable the Unix Extensions (which
Dan:
GNU tar uses text usernames preferentially, otherwise it falls back upon
numeric IDs. So if you had a user with the same user name as in the tar
file, it would chown it to that user's ID, not the same id as 'tarabas'.
This is true only for GNU format tar, however; SysV format tar files do
n
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Christopher Allen Wing wrote:
.. snipped ..
> tar should work okay, I think; by default it uses textual user names
> instead of numeric UIDs.
Not true. All the kernels I download from a certain local mirror are owned
by the local user 'tarabas' since the uid happens to be
2.4 does indeed use 32-bit integers for uid and gid in all places, with
the exception of BSD process accounting (for now). Quota should work fine
with UIDs >65535; however, you can not use the full 32 bits of UID due to
the format of the quota file. (you should be fine with hundreds of
thousands o
Yes, 2.4 has 32bit uid/gid support. No, 2.2 doesn't, but there is a patch
from http://www.engin.umich.edu/caen/systems/Linux. You'll probably have
to do some work to fit the patches into the latest 2.2 kernels though, as
they're no longer being maintained in leu of 2.4.
In addition to running a
12 matches
Mail list logo
