Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-06-15 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 15 June 2017 10:34:27 Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree: > > > >

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-06-15 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree: > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/ > > > > > > It is r

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-06-14 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/ > > > > It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-06-13 Thread Jan Kara
Hi, On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/ > > It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have > block size different from disk sector size and also dif

Re: udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-06-12 Thread Pali Rohár
Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/ It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have block size different from disk sector size and also different from 2048. But should not detection on 4K native di