Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Tony Hoyle wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line > > Me too.. > > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-a

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > > I see modversions.h being included properly on the command line Me too.. make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/drivers/char/drm' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-bo

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
> make 3.79.1 Ditto > gcc 2.95.2 2220 gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) and I really can't see that being relevant > ld 2.10.91 GNU ld version 2.10.90 (with BFD 2.10.0.18) > modversions 2.3.23 insmod version 2.3.21 I see modversions.h being included properly on the command li

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have > > the info files for gcc so > > I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be > > overridden/ignored. > > Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here Well I'm on: mak

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Alan Cox
> Possibly something in the auto-dependencies? Unfortunately I don't have > the info files for gcc so > I can't work out why the '-include' directive would be > overridden/ignored. Im wondering if it is make dependant. It seems to be working here - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Tony Hoyle wrote: > modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is > overriding it > in the case of the agpsupport.c file. If you move the include > to > the top of agpsupport.c it also works correctly. OK ignore the above putting it in agpsupport doesn't fix it. M

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Alan Cox wrote: > Wrong patch. Modversions.h should be getting automatically included. That > is what needs fixing. You've nicely located the problem and fixed the symptoms > for the module versioned case > modversions.h is being included in the 'gcc' line, however something is overriding it in t

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread Frank Jacobberger
Alan Cox wrote: > > > +#include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > > I just want to confirm that this small fix solves my drm > > problems as well - currently running -test13-pre7 > > > > Er, has anybody sent a patch to the maintainers? > > Wrong patch. Modversions.h sh

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread Alan Cox
> > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > I just want to confirm that this small fix solves my drm > problems as well - currently running -test13-pre7 > > Er, has anybody sent a patch to the maintainers? Wrong patch. Modversions.h should be getting automatically includ

Re: tdfx.o and -test13

2000-12-30 Thread J Sloan
Dieter Nützel wrote: > It haven't loaded since test13-pre1 for me. > Only the 'module version' was broken. > Last test12-pre7 was fine, here. > It was introduced with the Makefile cleanups. > > --- linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.oldThu Dec 28 16:27:34 2000 > +++ linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP