Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-10-26 Thread Jessica Yu
+++ Jiri Kosina [26/10/16 10:17 +0200]: On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's >> p

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-10-26 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the > >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency > >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's > >> patch to still work as intended). Th

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-10-25 Thread Rusty Russell
Jiri Kosina writes: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jessica Yu wrote: > >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's >> patch to still work as

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-10-07 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jessica Yu wrote: > Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the > cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency > (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's > patch to still work as intended). The least complic

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-09-23 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jessica Yu wrote: > Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the > cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency > (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's patch > to still work as intended). The least comp

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-09-22 Thread Jessica Yu
+++ Petr Mladek [21/09/16 13:47 +0200]: The commit 66cc69e34e86a231 ("Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE") updated module_taint_flags() to potentially print one more character. But it did not increase the size of the corresponding buffers in m_show() and print_mod

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-09-14 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2016-09-13 16:36:09, Jessica Yu wrote: > +++ Petr Mladek [12/09/16 16:13 +0200]: > >The commit 66cc69e34e86a231 ("Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: > >add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE") updated module_taint_flags() to > >potentially print one more character. But it did not increase the > >s

Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling

2016-09-13 Thread Jessica Yu
+++ Petr Mladek [12/09/16 16:13 +0200]: The commit 66cc69e34e86a231 ("Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE") updated module_taint_flags() to potentially print one more character. But it did not increase the size of the corresponding buffers in m_show() and print_mod