On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:55:04 +0100
Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you try the following, as of yet untested patch?
> It's i386 twin makes an APIC error vanish here on a K8.
>
> Karsten
> ---
> From 54248a
Am Samstag, 18. November 2006 12:43 schrieb Paolo Ornati:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:30:08 -0800
> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > APIC error on CPU0: 00(00)
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it an ACPI problem?
> > > >
> > > > a 00 error code? Never seen that ... How frequently does
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:30:08 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > APIC error on CPU0: 00(00)
> > > >
> > > > Is it an ACPI problem?
> > >
> > > a 00 error code? Never seen that ... How frequently does it happen?
> >
> > On my x86-64 boxes the "APIC error on CPU0" message a
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:46:05 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 17 November 2006 07:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > > > > drivers/base/power/resum
On Friday, 17 November 2006 07:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > > > drivers/base/power/resume.c:99
> > > > in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> > > >
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > > [] show
* Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > > drivers/base/power/resume.c:99
> > > in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> > >
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [] show_trace+0x34/0x47
> > > [] dump_stack+0x12/0x17
> > > [] device_resume+
> > I have no idea what causes:
> >
> > APIC error on CPU0: 00(00)
> >
> > Is it an ACPI problem?
What CPU/chipset?
>
> Strange. x86_64 has that stray exit_idle() in smp_error_interrupt() but
> afaict it won't cause this to happen.
>
> What's that idle_notifier doing in x86_64 anyway?
I
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:21:58 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Lots of sleeping while atomic warnings on 2.6.19-rc5
> > > During resume I see the following:
> > >
> > >
> > > platform floppy.0: EARLY resume
> > > API
> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Lots of sleeping while atomic warnings on 2.6.19-rc5
> > During resume I see the following:
> >
> >
> > platform floppy.0: EARLY resume
> > APIC error on CPU0: 00(00)
> > PM: Finishing wakeup.
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid co
9 matches
Mail list logo