Re: sata_sil Mod15Write quirk workaround patch for vanilla kernel avaialble.

2005-04-04 Thread Tejun Heo
Alexander Trotsai wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:51:28AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: TH> Hello, John. TH> TH> John Lash wrote: TH> >On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:01:23 +0900 TH> >Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: TH> > TH> > TH> >>Hello, guys. TH> >> TH> >>I generated m16w workaround patch for 2.6.11

Re: Re: sata_sil Mod15Write quirk workaround patch for vanilla kernel avaialble.

2005-04-04 Thread Alexander Trotsai
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:51:28AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: TH> Hello, John. TH> TH> John Lash wrote: TH> >On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:01:23 +0900 TH> >Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: TH> > TH> > TH> >>Hello, guys. TH> >> TH> >>I generated m16w workaround patch for 2.6.11.6 (by just removing two

Re: sata_sil Mod15Write quirk workaround patch for vanilla kernel avaialble.

2005-03-31 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, John. John Lash wrote: On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:01:23 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, guys. I generated m16w workaround patch for 2.6.11.6 (by just removing two lines :-) and set up a page regarding m15w quirk and the workaournd. I'm planning on updating m15w patch against

Re: sata_sil Mod15Write quirk workaround patch for vanilla kernel avaialble.

2005-03-31 Thread John Lash
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:01:23 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, guys. > > I generated m16w workaround patch for 2.6.11.6 (by just removing two > lines :-) and set up a page regarding m15w quirk and the workaournd. > I'm planning on updating m15w patch against the vanilla tr