On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 09:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave J
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 09:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > .config: http://paste.fedorapr
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 09:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > .config: http://paste.fedoraproject
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 09:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > .config: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/14281/94052971/raw/
> > >
> > > trace shows the problem process wa
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > .config: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/14281/94052971/raw/
> >
> > trace shows the problem process was 'cc1', so I was likely building a
> > kernel
> > at the time
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:23:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > .config: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/14281/94052971/raw/
> >
> > trace shows the problem process was 'cc1', so I was likely building a
> > kernel
> > at the time
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:23 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> .config: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/14281/94052971/raw/
>
> trace shows the problem process was 'cc1', so I was likely building a kernel
> at the time. There was also a trinity run going on in the background.
>
> cmdline: nothing specia
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:46:20AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > This looks to be the caused by the same issue that this patch fixes:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/537
> > >
> > > The schedule_user() was traced, and the preempt_enable_no_trace() that
> > > the func
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 12:40 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:49:18AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > ===
> > > [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> > > 3.10.0-rc2+ #1 Not tainted
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/rcupd
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:49:18AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > ===
> > [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> > 3.10.0-rc2+ #1 Not tainted
> > ---
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h:771 rcu_read_lock() used illegally while idle!
> > other inf
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 02:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:31:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Back from vacation, and breaking stuff already :)
> >
> > -rc2, plus some small local mods that shouldn't be a cause.
>
> Hmmm... I thought that ftrace already took care t
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:31:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Back from vacation, and breaking stuff already :)
>
> -rc2, plus some small local mods that shouldn't be a cause.
Hmmm... I thought that ftrace already took care to let RCU know that
the CPU should be considered non-idle before using
12 matches
Mail list logo
