On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:06:55PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Once we have the per cpu patchset merged we could do the following [it
> > even works without that patchset but the __this_cpu ops will not do
> > preemption checks]. Would this wor
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:06:55PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Once we have the per cpu patchset merged we could do the following [it
> even works without that patchset but the __this_cpu ops will not do
> preemption checks]. Would this work?
Looks plausible at first glance. But are you rea
2 matches
Mail list logo
