On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> #define SHMALL (SHMMAX/PAGE_SIZE*(SHMMNI/16)) /* max shm system wide (pages)
> */
> On my machine here, it is 2097152. It should be the same on any Intel IA32
ok thanks for it! I donwanna reboot my computer ;-)
10x4all
Narancs v1
-
To unsubscribe
> Is there any other solution than recompiling programs?
> all of the program which need shm/ipc will turn blue?
Congratulations you are running an old version of powertweak. Remvoe that
and it should recover (its setting shm limits to 0)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Narancs 1 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
>
> > /proc/sys/kernel/shmall to "0" (that is the maximum number of SHM
> > segments).
> yes, powertweak made it wrong. what is the good value for it?
according to /usr/src/linux/include/linux/shm.h:
#define SHM
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> /proc/sys/kernel/shmall to "0" (that is the maximum number of SHM segments).
yes, powertweak made it wrong.
what is the good value for it?
thx
Narancs v1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mess
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Narancs 1 wrote:
> Lots of things may have changed in 2.4.0-prer., because nor cdrecord
> neither postgressql do not run because of system v ipc / shm problem.
> After recompiling cdrecord with the new header files, started working.
> I'm just recompiling postgres too.
>
Do you run powertweak?
there is a new parameter
/proc/sys/kernel/shmall
and some powertweak versions set it to 0.
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www
6 matches
Mail list logo
