On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 22:45 +0100, Timo Kamph wrote:
> I guess you did somthing like this:
>
> 2.6.7 -patch-> 2.6.8 -patch-> 2.6.8.1 -patch-> 2.6.9 -patch-> 2.6.10.
>
> And you didn't noticed that the 2.6.9 patch failed, because it is diffed
> against 2.6.8 and not 2.6.8.1!
You're perfectly rig
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Viktor Horvath wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> today I patched myself up from 2.6.7 vanilla to 2.6.10 vanilla, but
> after all patches succeeded, "make menuconfig" shows "v2.6.8.1
> Configuration". Even worse, a compiled kernel calls in his bootlog
> himself "2.6.8.1". When inst
Viktor Horvath wrote:
Hello everybody,
today I patched myself up from 2.6.7 vanilla to 2.6.10 vanilla, but
after all patches succeeded, "make menuconfig" shows "v2.6.8.1
Configuration". Even worse, a compiled kernel calls in his bootlog
himself "2.6.8.1".
I guess you did somthing like this:
2.6.7
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Viktor Horvath wrote:
Hello everybody,
today I patched myself up from 2.6.7 vanilla to 2.6.10 vanilla, but
after all patches succeeded, "make menuconfig" shows "v2.6.8.1
Configuration". Even worse, a compiled kernel calls in his bootlog
himself "2.6.8.1". When installing the wh
4 matches
Mail list logo
