Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 1:11 PM Subject: Re: partition table: chs question > On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:24:07AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:11:56AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote: > > > > (See http://www.win.t

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Guest section DW
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:24:07AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:11:56AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote: > > (See http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-1.html ) > > Are types 57 and 77, labeled "VNDI Partition", actually in use? > > No. They are not.

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: Re: partition table: chs question > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > > > > > It does not matter because the usage of CHS will dies soon because it was > > voted to death in Austin last week. There will only be LBA addressing > > from now on out. > >

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
uch!). NetWare > > does a different calculation for conversion of cylinder values above 1024. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Guest section DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Andreas Jellinghaus&q

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:11:56AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 05:02:09PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > Please also check vger.timpanogas.org/nwfs/nwfs.tar.gz:disk.c for NetWare > > specific calculations of the CHS values, a different method is used for > > NetWa

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Guest section DW
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 05:02:09PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > Please also check vger.timpanogas.org/nwfs/nwfs.tar.gz:disk.c for NetWare > specific calculations of the CHS values, a different method is used for > NetWare partitions vs. everything else (Novell just had to be different). > > On

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Andre Hedrick
> To: "Andreas Jellinghaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 2:47 PM > Subject: Re: partition table: chs question > > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:35:34PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > &g

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andreas Jellinghaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 2:47 PM Subject: Re: partition table: chs question > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:35:34PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > > for partitions n

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
- Original Message - From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Guest section DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas Jellinghaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:02 PM Subject: Re:

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Guest section DW
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:35:34PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > for partitions not in the first 8gb of a harddisk, what > should the c/h/s start and end value be ? > > most fdisks seem to set start and end to 255/63/1023. > but partition magic creates partitions with start set to > 0/1/10

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Tim Moore
> for partitions not in the first 8gb of a harddisk, what > should the c/h/s start and end value be ? http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Large-Disk-HOWTO.html -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info