Re: [Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-03-02 Thread Jeremy Jackson
Manfred Spraul wrote: > Neelam Saboo wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > After I installed a newer version of Kernel (2.4.2) and enable DMA option in Ah hah! There's a huge difference in performance (in my experience) with DMA. also, using hdparm utility, *most* drives work fine with dma, irq unmasking

Re: [Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-03-02 Thread Manfred Spraul
Neelam Saboo wrote: > > hi, > > After I installed a newer version of Kernel (2.4.2) and enable DMA option in > hardware configuration, the behavior changes. > I can see performance improvements when another thread is used. Also, i can > see timing overlaps between two threads. i.e. when one thre

[Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-03-02 Thread Neelam Saboo
hi, After I installed a newer version of Kernel (2.4.2) and enable DMA option in hardware configuration, the behavior changes. I can see performance improvements when another thread is used. Also, i can see timing overlaps between two threads. i.e. when one thread is blocked on a page fault, othe

Re: [Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-03-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Neelam Saboo wrote: > > Another observation. I have two independent programs. One program incurring > page faults and another program just doing some work. > When work program run undependently it takes ~19 seconds of CPU time, but when > it is run along with page faulting program on the same mac

Re: [Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-02-28 Thread Neelam Saboo
Another observation. I have two independent programs. One program incurring page faults and another program just doing some work. When work program run undependently it takes ~19 seconds of CPU time, but when it is run along with page faulting program on the same machine, it takes ~32 seconds of C

Re: [Re: paging behavior in Linux]

2001-02-28 Thread Neelam Saboo
Another observation. I have two independent programs. One program incurring page faults and another program just doing some work. When work program run undependently it takes ~19 seconds of CPU time, but when it is run along with page faulting program on the same machine, it takes ~32 seconds of C

Re: paging behavior in Linux

2001-02-28 Thread Andrew Morton
David Mansfield wrote: > > Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > > > > > When I run my program on a readhat linux machine, I dont get results as > > > expected, work thread seems to be stuck when prefetch thread is waiting on > > > a page fault > > > > > That's a known problem: > > > > The paging io for

Re: paging behavior in Linux

2001-02-28 Thread David Mansfield
Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > > When I run my program on a readhat linux machine, I dont get results as > > expected, work thread seems to be stuck when prefetch thread is waiting on > > a page fault > > > That's a known problem: > > The paging io for a process is controlled with a per-process s

Re: paging behavior in Linux

2001-02-28 Thread Manfred Spraul
> > When I run my program on a readhat linux machine, I dont get results as > expected, work thread seems to be stuck when prefetch thread is waiting on > a page fault > That's a known problem: The paging io for a process is controlled with a per-process semaphore. The semaphore is held while