Re: now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add theide-patch

2000-10-15 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: >If they will be accepted, I will update them and maintain them. >I just do not have the time to run two/three trees and prepare the stuff >for 2.5 > >> Because it is unmaintained? Once it is in the kernel, Alan will >> be the one getting bug reports, so

Re: now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add theide-patch

2000-10-15 Thread Andre Hedrick
If they will be accepted, I will update them and maintain them. I just do not have the time to run two/three trees and prepare the stuff for 2.5 > Because it is unmaintained? Once it is in the kernel, Alan will > be the one getting bug reports, so he should be the one to decide > ultimately. N

Re: now that NFS V3 is in 2.2.18pre, could we *please* add theide-patch

2000-10-15 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I know it crashes some via chipsets when autotuning (IIRC), but >if it were added behind CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL it couldn't do any >harm, could it? Yes it could. I personally *NEED* the IDE patches. That is NOT good enough reason to include them in t