Re: nfsd bugfixes

2007-11-12 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:35:01AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > (CC: trimmed - as Bruce says: separate discussion) > > On Monday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:08:42AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > Calling nfsd_setuser an extra time does open us up for a ver

Re: nfsd bugfixes

2007-11-12 Thread Neil Brown
(CC: trimmed - as Bruce says: separate discussion) On Monday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:08:42AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > Calling nfsd_setuser an extra time does open us up for a very tiny > > possibility of an ENOMEM at an awkward time. > > Hm. Could

Re: nfsd bugfixes

2007-11-12 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:08:42AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Monday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The following two patches are nfsd bugfixes that I believe are > > appropriate for 2.6.24 and 2.6.23.y. > > > > --b. > > > > Both > Reviewed-By: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Than

Re: nfsd bugfixes

2007-11-12 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following two patches are nfsd bugfixes that I believe are > appropriate for 2.6.24 and 2.6.23.y. > > --b. > Both Reviewed-By: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Calling nfsd_setuser an extra time does open us up for a very tiny possibility of