Re: mount and 2.2.18

On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:26:52PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > Thomas Pornin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > But NFSv3 is great; if your server is NFSv3 aware, I suggest you shift > > > your client to NFSv3 as well. It rocks. > > > > Can anyone point me to some docs describing the benefits

Re: mount and 2.2.18

> Thomas Pornin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But NFSv3 is great; if your server is NFSv3 aware, I suggest you shift > > your client to NFSv3 as well. It rocks. > > Can anyone point me to some docs describing the benefits of NFSv3? Thanks. Not off hand but I can give you a very brief summar

Re: mount and 2.2.18

Thomas Pornin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But NFSv3 is great; if your server is NFSv3 aware, I suggest you shift > your client to NFSv3 as well. It rocks. Can anyone point me to some docs describing the benefits of NFSv3? Thanks. -- Brady Montz [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this

Re: mount and 2.2.18

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > Is this harmless or do I need the latest mount? The latest mount is needed only for NFSv3 support. As long as you do only NFSv2, there is no problem (except the message, you will get it once per mounting). But NFSv3 is great; if your server is NFSv3 aw