Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:57:58 +0900 > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST) > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900 > > > > > [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU cod

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-19 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900 > > > [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits > > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-17 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900 > [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Looks good, but I think it will break sound for some ALI chips. Please see arch/sparc64/k

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-15 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Sorry for the late response, On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:40:36 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900 > > > Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management > > like POWER IOMMUs so it

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-11 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900 > Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management > like POWER IOMMUs so it could use lib/iommu-helper as POWER does. Please look at Linus's current tree, I believe I have things in a working state

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:01:47 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900 > > > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST) > > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I intend to put merging back i

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-06 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900 > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST) > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I intend to put merging back in, perhaps something similar to > > powerpc's merging logic but without the expensive (in my opi

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:12:36 +0900 > > > Really sorry about it. > > I am happy to test patches you send to me in the future :-) Thanks a lot. > > PARISC, Alpha, an

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-06 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:12:36 +0900 > Really sorry about it. I am happy to test patches you send to me in the future :-) > PARISC, Alpha, and IA64 IOMMUs use the two-pass algorithm like SPARC > but their first pass decides how to merge sg entires (and

Re: more iommu sg merging fallout

2008-02-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:41:38 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sparc64 change: > > commit fde6a3c82d67f592eb587be4d1b0ae6d4321 > Author: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon Feb 4 22:28:02 2008 -0800 > > iommu sg merging: sparc64: make