On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:24:48PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> This is a pity, because I think the current behaviour is not acceptable,
> as it can kill the machine by just being invoked by kmod.
> I will try to make sense out of the code and make sure that modprobe
> will not go crazy, by either
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 07:33:53AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:22:59 +0100,
> Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Find attached the modules.dep that caused this: There is a circular
> >dependency of pppoe on pppox on pppoe on
>
> The kernel code is broken. Cir
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:22:59 +0100,
> Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Find attached the modules.dep that caused this: There is a circular
> >dependency of pppoe on pppox on pppoe on
>
> The kernel code is broken. Circular dependencies m
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:22:59 +0100,
Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Find attached the modules.dep that caused this: There is a circular
>dependency of pppoe on pppox on pppoe on
The kernel code is broken. Circular dependencies make no sense, the
pppoe maintainer agrees and I thoug
4 matches
Mail list logo
