Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-08 Thread David Ford
BTW, you ONLY need to echo 1 > /proc../sysrq if you use a distribution that puts a 0 there on init. By default the kernel initializes with '1'. David >>>I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at >>>all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > >> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. > >> > > >> > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel > >> > left it out. > >> >

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-07 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote: >> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. >> > >> > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel >> > left it out. >> >> I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitel

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-07 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 31 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:48:34 -0600 >From: D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: unlisted-recipients:;;@timpanogas.com (no To-header on input) >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: Re: missing

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-02 Thread Russell King
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug? Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button. ctrl-alt-del needs keventd to wor

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Russell King wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:10:55PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > That seems like a very bad idea. What if there is a boot script bug? > > Also think about kernel panics - the only thing that works after that > is the power or (if you have it connected) reset button.

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Russell King wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some > > idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and > > they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.) > > Umm, its off by default

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-02 Thread Russell King
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:13:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Let me guess... you're using a RedHat system? RedHat, for some > idiotic reason, defaults to actively turning this off for you (and > they turn Stop-A off on SPARC, too.) Umm, its off by default in 2.4.5 kernels, unless altered by

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie: > > > Have you tried "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq"? > > > You need both, compiled in and activation. > > > > no,

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-01 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2001 16:51 schrieben Sie: > > Have you tried "echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq"? > > You need both, compiled in and activation. > > no, look at the code. the enable variable defaults to 1. Then there must be a bug? I get "0" with 2.4.5-ac2 and -ac5 without "echo 1". Fresh boo

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-01 Thread D. Stimits
Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > D. Stimits wrote: > > > > > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. > > > > > > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel > > > left it ou

Re: missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread Dieter Nützel
> D. Stimits wrote: > > > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. > > > > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel > > left it out. > > I compiled it, and the sysrq is d

Re: missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread D. Stimits
Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. > > It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it > out. I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at all. I

Re: missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it out. > vm.freepages = 383 766 1149 tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe fr