On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:31:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs-kdave tree got conflicts in:
>
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> fs/btrfs/send.c
> fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:58:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs-kdave tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/btrfs/inode.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 58efbc9f5463 ("Btrfs: fix blk_status_t/errno confusion")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> e6961ca
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:18:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs-kdave tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e6959b9350c6 ("btrfs: add support for passing in write hints for buffered
> writes")
>
> f
On Tuesday 02 Feb 2016 10:22:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs-kdave tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/btrfs/file.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 9703fefe0b13 ("Btrf
4 matches
Mail list logo